ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

KBT090 Bioreactors design and control spring 2011, KBT090

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-27 - 2011-06-07
Antal svar: 26
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 59%
Kontaktperson: Carl Johan Franzén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Bioreactors: design and control - Course evaluation 2010

We appreciate that you take this time to answer the questions to help us improve the course.

If you have comments, please collect them in the end of the questionnaire!

Your background

1. What was your previous education?

26 svarande

Chalmers Bt»16 61%
Chalmers K»0 0%
Chalmers other»0 0%
Other Swedish University»0 0%
Other Chemical Engineering»2 7%
Other Biotechnology / Bioengineering»1 3%
Other Chemistry»1 3%
Other Biology»3 11%
Other Molecular Biology»0 0%
Other»3 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

2. What MPBIO track are you following?

26 svarande

Biomedicine and biotechnology»7 26%
Food and health»10 38%
Biomaterials and tissue engineering»8 30%
Other (e.g. other master program)»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

Your own effort

3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

26 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 11%
Around 20 hours/week»3 11%
Around 25 hours/week»7 26%
Around 30 hours/week»8 30%
At least 35 hours/week»5 19%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

26 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 7%
75%»8 30%
100%»16 61%

Genomsnitt: 4.53

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

5. How understandable are the course goals?

26 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»12 46%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

6. Are the goals reasonable considering your background, the course level and the number of credits?

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 7%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 76%
No, the goals are set too high»2 7%
I am not aware of the goals»2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

7. Did the examination as a whole assess whether you have reached the goals?

The course was examined in four parts:

Written literature assignment report (0-20 p)
Oral literature assignment presentation (0-10 p)
Exercise asssignment report (0-30 p)
Final exam (0-60 p)

The final grade was based on the sum of points from all parts.

26 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»4 18%
To a large extent»9 40%
Yes, definitely»8 36%
I do not know»4

Genomsnitt: 3.09 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. Did the final exam assess whether you have reached the goals?

25 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»5 25%
To a large extent»12 60%
Yes, definitely»2 10%
I do not know»5

Genomsnitt: 2.75

9. Did the Literature assignment / Research proposal assess whether you have reached the goals?

This concerns both the written report and the oral presentation.

26 svarande

No, not at all»2 8%
To some extent»6 25%
To a large extent»9 37%
Yes, definitely»7 29%
I do not know»2

Genomsnitt: 2.87

10. Did the Exercise report assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all»2 8%
To some extent»6 26%
To a large extent»9 39%
Yes, definitely»6 26%
I do not know»3

Genomsnitt: 2.82

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.09

Teaching and course administration

11. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

26 svarande

Small extent»1 3%
Some extent»6 23%
Large extent»12 46%
Great extent»7 26%
I do not know»0

Genomsnitt: 2.96

12. To what extent has the course material been of help for your learning?

Course material pertains to the written material, i.e. the course PM, the exercise collection, the Matlab tutorial, the written instructions for the literature assignment, the reference articles, E-book chapters, and slide show hand-outs from lectures.

26 svarande

Small extent»2 8%
Some extent»5 20%
Large extent»12 48%
Great extent»6 24%
I do not know»1

Genomsnitt: 2.88

13. To what extent did the computer exercises help you learn the course?

26 svarande

Small extent»4 15%
Some extent»11 42%
Large extent»6 23%
Great extent»5 19%
I do no know»0

Genomsnitt: 2.46

14. Did you get enough help with computer exercises from the exercise teacher?

26 svarande

Yes, in the computer studio»11 42%
Yes, at other times»8 30%
No»6 23%
I did not actively seek help»1 3%

Genomsnitt: 1.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

15. Please tick the statements that you think are relevant for each lecture. You may give several answers.

This lecture ...

Matrisfråga

Lisbeth Olsson - Introduction: Bio-based production
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»12 46%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»7 26%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»10 38%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»0 0%
did not leave me any lasting memory»1 3%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»0 0%
inspired me to learn more»3 11%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»6 23%
Did not attend this lecture»1

Calle Franzén - Theory: Bioreactors, Mass balances, Mass transfer (2.5 lectures)
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»12 46%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»14 53%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»3 11%
was boring and uninteresting»1 3%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»3 11%
did not leave me any lasting memory»0 0%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»4 15%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»13 50%
Did not attend this lecture»0

Calle Franzén - Physiologically based control (Two lectures)
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»11 42%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»12 46%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»3 11%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»3 11%
did not leave me any lasting memory»1 3%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»3 11%
inspired me to learn more»5 19%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»11 42%
Did not attend this lecture»0

Calle Franzén - Gas analysis and RQ control
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»8 30%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»8 30%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»3 11%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»5 19%
did not leave me any lasting memory»1 3%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»2 7%
inspired me to learn more»1 3%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»10 38%
Did not attend this lecture»2

Thomas Grotkjaer - Economic evaluation of industrial biotech products
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»4 15%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»2 7%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»1 3%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»7 26%
was boring and uninteresting»1 3%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»2 7%
did not leave me any lasting memory»3 11%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»3 11%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»1 3%
Keep it!»3 11%
Did not attend this lecture»3

Lisbeth Olsson - Monitoring and control, fluorescence
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»6 23%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»6 23%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»3 11%
was boring and uninteresting»1 3%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»4 15%
did not leave me any lasting memory»3 11%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»2 7%
inspired me to learn more»3 11%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»5 19%
Did not attend this lecture»2

Lisbeth Olsson - Metabolic engineering, biofuels
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»8 30%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»7 26%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»5 19%
was boring and uninteresting»2 7%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»1 3%
did not leave me any lasting memory»1 3%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»2 7%
inspired me to learn more»3 11%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»4 15%
Did not attend this lecture»1

16. Please tick the statements that you think are relevant for each lecture. You may give several answers.

This lecture ...

Matrisfråga

Nicklas Bonander - Protein production in P pastoris and other yeasts
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»4 15%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»4 15%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»4 15%
was boring and uninteresting»2 7%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»4 15%
did not leave me any lasting memory»2 7%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»2 7%
inspired me to learn more»3 11%
Change it for something else!»1 3%
Keep it!»4 15%
Did not attend this lecture»3

Malin Bäckström - Mammalian cell culture
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»10 38%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»4 15%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»6 23%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»0 0%
did not leave me any lasting memory»0 0%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»0 0%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»4 15%
Did not attend this lecture»4

Ulrich Krühne - Microbioreactors
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»7 26%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»0 0%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»2 7%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»6 23%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»4 15%
did not leave me any lasting memory»0 0%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»4 15%
inspired me to learn more»4 15%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»5 19%
Did not attend this lecture»2

Louise Johansson - Development of industrial enzyme production
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»6 23%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»7 26%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»5 19%
was boring and uninteresting»1 3%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»0 0%
did not leave me any lasting memory»3 11%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»0 0%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»5 19%
Did not attend this lecture»2

Sheila Peters - Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetics
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»5 19%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»2 7%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»1 3%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»2 7%
was boring and uninteresting»2 7%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»13 50%
did not leave me any lasting memory»4 15%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»6 23%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»5 19%
Keep it!»2 7%
Did not attend this lecture»3

Maria Viloria Cols - Biobutanol production and Cryogels for tissue engineering
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»10 38%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»4 15%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»7 26%
was boring and uninteresting»2 7%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»2 7%
did not leave me any lasting memory»1 3%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»1 3%
inspired me to learn more»2 7%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»3 11%
Did not attend this lecture»2

Study visit to Christian Hansen
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»14 53%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»9 34%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»6 23%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»0 0%
did not leave me any lasting memory»0 0%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»0 0%
inspired me to learn more»6 23%
Change it for something else!»0 0%
Keep it!»12 46%
Did not attend this lecture»5

Study visit to Novozymes R&D and Pilot plant
26 svarande

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

was relevant and interesting»10 38%
was irrelevant for the course, but interesting to listen to»1 3%
was an important part of the course, and aided my learning»6 23%
gave me a broader perspective of the course contents»6 23%
was boring and uninteresting»0 0%
included too much info, difficult to know what to learn»0 0%
did not leave me any lasting memory»0 0%
was difficult to follow, but relevant for the course»0 0%
inspired me to learn more»5 19%
Change it for something else!»1 3%
Keep it!»11 42%
Did not attend this lecture»5

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

25 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»10 41%
Very well»13 54%
I do not know»1

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 1.88

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

25 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»2 8%
Rather good»14 58%
Very good»7 29%
I did not seek help»1

Genomsnitt: 3.12

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

25 svarande

Very poorly»2 8%
Rather poorly»3 12%
Rather well»8 33%
Very well»11 45%
I did not seek cooperation»1

Genomsnitt: 3.16

20. How was the course workload?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»2 8%
High»18 72%
Too high»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 4

21. How was the total workload this study period?

25 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 8%
High»15 60%
Too high»8 32%

Genomsnitt: 4.24

Alterrnative evaluation

We would appreciate if you also summarize your feelings about the course by answering the alternative questions below! They give better information on the kind of learning that the course has stimulated!

22. Please indicate to which extent you agree with the following statement about the course!

Matrisfråga

It was always easy to know the expected standard of the work
21 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»6 28%
Well, ok.»10 47%
I agree.»4 19%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

The course developed my ability to solve problems
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»2 9%
Well, ok.»4 18%
I agree.»14 63%
I strongly agree!»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

The teacher of this course motivated me to do my best
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»2 8%
Well, ok.»4 17%
I agree.»9 39%
I strongly agree!»8 34%

Genomsnitt: 4

The workload was too high
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»6 26%
Well, ok.»8 34%
I agree.»3 13%
I strongly agree!»6 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

The course sharpened my analytical abilities
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»0 0%
Well, ok.»12 54%
I agree.»9 40%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

I usually had a clear view of where I was going and what was expected of me
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»6 26%
Well, ok.»5 21%
I agree.»9 39%
I strongly agree!»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.39

The teacher spent a lot of time on commenting my work
21 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»6 28%
Well, ok.»8 38%
I agree.»5 23%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

To do well in this course, the only thing one needed was a good memory
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»9 39%
I disagree.»11 47%
Well, ok.»1 4%
I agree.»2 8%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.82

The course helped me develop my ability to work as a member of a team
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»3 13%
I disagree.»6 27%
Well, ok.»7 31%
I agree.»6 27%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

As a result of this course, I feel prepared to deal with unusual problems
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»5 22%
Well, ok.»8 36%
I agree.»9 40%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

The course improved my ability in written communication
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»6 26%
Well, ok.»5 21%
I agree.»10 43%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

The teacher appeared more interesting in testing what I had memorized than what I had understood
21 svarande

I strongly disagree!»4 19%
I disagree.»11 52%
Well, ok.»3 14%
I agree.»3 14%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

It was often difficult to know what was expected of me
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»11 50%
Well, ok.»7 31%
I agree.»1 4%
I strongly agree!»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

Most of the time, I was given enough time to understand
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»5 22%
Well, ok.»9 40%
I agree.»7 31%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

The teachers made a real effort to understand the difficulties that I might have had
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»2 9%
I disagree.»3 13%
Well, ok.»3 13%
I agree.»14 63%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

The course encouraged me to develop my interest for studying as far as possible
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»4 18%
Well, ok.»7 31%
I agree.»10 45%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

The teachers usually gave me usual feedback on my progress
21 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»4 19%
Well, ok.»10 47%
I agree.»6 28%
I strongly agree!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

The lecturer was extremely good at explaining things
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»8 36%
Well, ok.»8 36%
I agree.»4 18%
I strongly agree!»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

I was too often asked about pure facts
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»2 9%
I disagree.»10 45%
Well, ok.»8 36%
I agree.»0 0%
I strongly agree!»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

The teacher worked hard to make his/her subject interesting
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»3 13%
Well, ok.»10 43%
I agree.»7 30%
I strongly agree!»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

There was a lot of pressure on me to do well in this course
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»4 17%
Well, ok.»2 8%
I agree.»13 56%
I strongly agree!»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

The course helped me to develop my ability to plan my own work
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»1 4%
Well, ok.»9 40%
I agree.»8 36%
I strongly agree!»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

The pure amount of work stopped me from learning everything
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»6 27%
Well, ok.»7 31%
I agree.»4 18%
I strongly agree!»4 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

The teacher made it clear from the start what they expected from me
22 svarande

I strongly disagree!»1 4%
I disagree.»3 13%
Well, ok.»8 36%
I agree.»6 27%
I strongly agree!»4 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

On the whole, I am satisfied with the quality of the course
23 svarande

I strongly disagree!»0 0%
I disagree.»2 8%
Well, ok.»4 17%
I agree.»13 56%
I strongly agree!»4 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.82

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

25 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»3 12%
Adequate»2 8%
Good»16 64%
Excellent»4 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The study trip!»
- I think both Calle and Lisbeth have been very clear with things and what we should do. Pleas keep it that way! Nice that you printed the lecture notes for us, sometimes the fiels are too big for the students-printer, so we don"t get them out. Study visit was very nice!!!»
- Literature assignment.!! and matlab exercise!»
- make better slides,I can not find enough information from slides»
- The field trip to Chr.Hansen. »
- Study trips»
- Study visit»
- The simulation exercise, but with more tutors present.»
- The Matlab project and the study visit.»
- The literature assignment! Something like this should come mucj earlier for biotech students. Study visits»
- The assignments and the number of credits you can earn on them. I think it is fair that you can pass the course if you do very well in the assignments. »
- Industrial trips and literature assignments»
- the two projects»
- Site visit, it give real experience and more inspiration.»
- The study trip to biotechnology enterprises was only way to see bioreactors in practise.Why there was no possibility to see bioreactors in Göteborg?»
- Literature Assignment and Industrial Visit»
- The division of the course and that the literature assignment and the matlab project is a part of the points of the course. The study visits!!! But why did we have to stand and listen to the second part of Novozymes, in that hot room?? Besides, that felt more like a lecture than interesting info of what they do. I would have prefered if the two parts of the novozymes visit was at the same amount of time, that is much shorter for the last one. »
- The MATLAB project»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I t would be great to have the study visit earlier in the course if possible, and a schedule for the day. Also for the computer assignment, it would be good to have a shell for the matlab-program to work from. Now we put a lot of time for the program to work, and missed some time for the analysis which were the part we were mainly supposed to learn. Maybe have an extra person able to help during the exercises?»
- some more help in matlab, ask some PhD students or master students to help. »
- For matlab,somebody just waiting for the result from teammate and didn"t do anything.But maybe he/she can get 30.Somebody like me need to do every part of project but only get low grade.It is not fair.»
- The field trip to Novozymes, since they had like two or three lectures as well. Perhaps it is possible to visit some company in/outside of Gothenburg instead?»
- The programming »
- Exercise assigment»
- The literature project felt superfluous and rather poorly executed. This course evaluation form is abjectly terrible, the "Alterrnative evaluation"[sic] in particular is poorly written and excessively vague.»
- More teachers helping at computer session.»
- At least one more to hjelp with the matlab programming»
- Sheilas lecture»
- simulations assignments teaching style»
- One lecturer at the matlab tutorials was too little, you should have another teching assistant that could answer the questions about the simulation exercise. It took too ling time until we could get help»
- In case of international students it would be better at least one lecture as introduction to mat lab perhaps the tutorial paper is not enough.»
- Why there are no laboratory experiments?At least one should help to understand f.ex. such practical things as monitoring of bioreactor.Everything was presented in very teoretical level.Please take a look how many slides are presented under 5 minutes by lecturers (with exclusion of Calle)- there is only quantity and not quality.Lecturer Lisbeth several times asked auditorium if somebody have worked with bioreactors.If couple of students answered "Yes", she think that this is anwer from all of us and there are not needed more deeper explanations about slide. Why the student auditorium is met as common mass (that is like in Swedish Jantelagen that all are equal!)Why the oral presentation of the litterature project is evaluated separatly from all project? Biotechnology course is not for preparation of teachers, pedagogs to work afront of auditorium! »
- An introduction to matlab for International Students should be give an as a mandatory before the start of the course»
- That it takes so long time to get help for the matlab project. Get one more supervisor or change the assignment so Calle dont have to help everybody so much. »
- There should be more guidance and a clearer outline for the literature project. There should be more people providing aid during the MATLAB sessions.»

26. Additional comments

- Nice course, teachers have had a nice attitude and always tried to help (even though more matlab help would be needed). Good work!!»
- It"s better to inform the students what kind of software will be used in the lectures when they are enrolled (international students) to give them time to learn by themselves.»
- We should give students more time to study about MabLab and its application for the course at the beginning of this course.»
- Basic Matlab course for biotechnology programme should be introduced for effective learning»
- At the beggining of course exercise part teacher already knows the situation, that some students can have problems with MatLab programm (it is written in the description of the exercises) but there are no possibilities for "problemetic students" to avoid discrimination.The help is given only by one teacher for the "problemetic" and "non-problematic" students in the same way.There is no litterature given to improve the knowledge for "problematic" students. Only students with previous years studies in Chalmers can fullfill the objectives of MatLab exercises.Is that not the discrimination? Only some teacheres presented the lecture with aim to LEARN students something. Mostly the lecture was as heavy burden to very quickly present it without looking after feedback that students have understood it.The attitute to students many times was - you need to know about this tema before I start to present you quickly sometheing with slides. »
- Industrial Visit have really inspired me to work in the field of Industrial Biotechnology»
- The lecture from Astra Zeneca I think could have been really interesting but she spoke too fast about too few slides. If the message had gone through I think it would have been much more interesting. »

Thanks!

Thank you very much for taking this time and for giving us your feedback on the course! Have a good summer and good luck in the future!

Calle and Lisbeth

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.43
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.47

Kursutvärderingssystem från