ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Innovation Management Seminar Course 2011, IIN070

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-24 - 2011-06-06
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 93%
Kontaktperson: Maria Elmquist»

Overall impressions

1. How was the course workload?*

14 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 9 64%

High» 5 35%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- In relation to other courses, the work load was relatively low. However, since the load was somewhat lower, you had more time to spend on the readings. Total output (=learning) = more than the average course.» (Adequate)
- High when taken the term paper into acount.» (High)
- Always had something to do, especially when taking Magnus Holméns course at the same time.» (High)
- Difficult to combine with the method course in a good way.» (High)

2. What is your general impression of the course?*

14 svarande

Worst course ever» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 0 0%

Good» 6 42%

Excellent» 8 57%

Best course ever» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4.57

- Danger close to best course ever thanks to the format of seminars.» (Excellent)
- Very good, due to the more depth info 5 specific areas that before have only been covered more generally. Also, good with discussion of articles and put different views againts each other. » (Excellent)

3. What do you think about the course administration?*

14 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Bad» 0 0%

OK» 5 35%

Good» 8 57%

Great» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Have gotten somewhat spoiled with always having lecturers and others to turn to anytime to have them read your paper and so on.» (OK)
- It did not affect me, but some people complained that some "special" papers were made available with a very short notice through email just a few days before the seminar.» (Good)
- Clear instruction of deadline and how to hand them in.» (Good)

4. What do you think about seminar-based teaching as a format?*

14 svarande

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather bad» 0 0%

Rather good» 0 0%

Very good» 9 64%

Excellent» 5 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.35

- Would have been "Excellent", only it always depends on the leader...» (Very good)
- The form is very good although different seminar leaders have very different ideas on how it should be structured and performed.» (Very good)
- It is excellent, learning by understanding rather than learning by memorizing a list of concepts and formulas!» (Excellent)
- Good, as different views and aspect of the same concept is put forth and discussed. Good as both the posititve and negative aspects are covered. Something that is forgotten in other courses where many concepts and framworks are just accepted. » (Excellent)

5. Did the learning diary exercise contribute to your own learning?*

14 svarande

Yes» 5 35%

No» 9 64%

Genomsnitt: 1.64

- A little bit. Thanks to it I remembered what to improve for the next time» (Yes)
- It help me in the following semiars as I reflected on my participation and what I could to differently in the upcoming seminars. » (Yes)
- I did it allmost all the same day. But good to get the opportunity to express how I thought different seminars were.» (No)
- It was more of a pain in the ass ,)» (No)
- Was done in a late stage.» (No)

6. What do you think of the examination format? (50% seminars, 50% term paper)*

14 svarande

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather bad» 1 7%

Rather good» 4 28%

Very good» 8 57%

Excellent» 1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Would like to have more seminars and less paper.» (Rather bad)
- Lets see until I get the grade. Difficult not to get any feedback ever on the reflections.» (Rather good)
- Could be better if you got some early feedback on your seminar results, now you don"t have a clue really how you did until the Ladok mail arrives. Easier to get a feel of how you are doing in other courses perhaps.» (Rather good)
- I think it"s good but it is a big problem that the results were not available. So it"s hard to know if something can be improved.» (Very good)
- Good to put the grading equal as this means that both that studetns (at least me) put much effort on both formats. Also good as the seminars help you in reading articles, more critical, which is very useful when doing the term papers. So the two formats complement each other well. » (Very good)

Lectures

Only answer if you participated in the lectures - if not please choose "No opinion"

7. What did yoiu think of Lecture 1 on Reading/analyzing texts (Maria Elmquist)?*

14 svarande

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather bad» 0 0%

Rather good» 6 42%

Very good» 8 57%

Excellent» 0 0%

No opinion» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Have never gott a framework for analying texts, so good to get some tools that assist the readings, not only in this course but in the future as well. » (Very good)

8. What did you think of Lecture 2 on Writing academic texts (Maria Elmquist)?*

14 svarande

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather bad» 0 0%

Rather good» 5 35%

Very good» 8 57%

Excellent» 1 7%

No opinion» 0

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Good to get some concrete input on usual mistakes. The layout, structure and content of the report was however not new, as we have writen scientific papers before. » (Rather good)
- I like the fact that you went back to basics (explaining latin prefixes and words etc.) instead of simply assume that everyone knows everything from the beginning as with some other lecturers... I am sure that a majority did not KNOW exactly the difference between i.e. and e.g. but rather used the gut feeling...» (Excellent)