ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Energy systems modelling and planning, MEN115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-05-19 - 2011-06-06
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 26%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 31%
Around 20 hours/week»3 18%
Around 25 hours/week»4 25%
Around 30 hours/week»3 18%
At least 35 hours/week»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The work load was too high» (Around 30 hours/week)
- the work is very intensive» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»4 25%
75%»9 56%
100%»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the learning outcomes?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 37%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»12 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 53%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.25

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»5 31%
Some extent»8 50%
Large extent»3 18%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- The exam was really not based on the lectures at all, and not very related to the projects.» (Small extent)

7. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Erik Ahlgren

16 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»4 25%
Rather well»11 68%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

8. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Mikael Odenberg

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»3 18%
Rather well»10 62%
Very well»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3

9. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Elsa Fahlén

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 12%
Rather well»12 75%
Very well»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

10. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Niklas Vahlne

15 svarande

Very badly»2 13%
Rather badly»5 33%
Rather well»8 53%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

11. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by Lina Reichenberg

16 svarande

Very badly»2 12%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»10 62%
Very well»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Linas lecture was very structured and easy to follow.» (Very well)

12. How do you assess the quality of the lectures by German Maldonado

16 svarande

Very badly»7 43%
Rather badly»6 37%
Rather well»2 12%
Very well»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- I honestly don"t even know what his lectures were supposed to cover.» (Rather badly)
- Really interesting but can"t be easily matched with the aim of the course» (Rather well)

13. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 1 (debate on district heating)

16 svarande

Small extent»6 37%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»2 12%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- I didnt really understand the point of that assignment.» (Small extent)
- The answer should be better explained, especially on the slides. When studying for the exam it was very hard to decipher what was meant.» (Small extent)

14. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 2 (load curves and reference energy systems)

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»7 43%
Large extent»6 37%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

15. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 3 (biogas)

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- Have done a Whole project on biogas on the Bachelor level before..» (Small extent)

16. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 4 (MARTES)

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»13 81%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

17. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 5 (LEAP)

16 svarande

Small extent»7 43%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»6 37%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

- A small step for us but a giant LEAP for mankind...» (Small extent)
- This project was ill defined and really difficult to carry out since we didn"t really know what we were supposed to do.» (Small extent)
- We had to little time to learn the software, it felt like many important aspects were missed due to time spent on troubleshooting.» (Some extent)

18. To what extent has the assignments been of help for your learning Assignment 6 (LP)

16 svarande

Small extent»1 6%
Some extent»4 25%
Large extent»8 50%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- This assignment was very good!» (Great extent)

19. How do you assess the supervision by Elsa Fahlén (assignment 4)

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 12%
Rather well»9 56%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

20. How do you assess the supervision by Niklas Vahne (assignment 5)

16 svarande

Very badly»1 6%
Rather badly»3 18%
Rather well»7 43%
Very well»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

21. How do you assess the supervision by Lina Reichenberg/Martin Börjesson (assignment 6)

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»6 37%
Very well»9 56%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

22. To what extent was the open character of the biogas assignment (you had to define your own task) a positive element of the course?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- It would have been better with a slightly more welldefined project.» (Some extent)
- It was much more fun to see the presentations.» (Large extent)

23. To what extent has the assignment student presentations (your own and your fellow student´,s) been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»5 31%
Some extent»5 31%
Large extent»4 25%
Great extent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- To be honest, it felt quite pointless (except assignment 3). Since everyone had done the same thing it was boring and didn"t give much. Assignment 3 should be presented, the other should not.» (Small extent)
- If I hadn"t been able to discuss things with my friends I would surely have failed the exam. Though I can"t be sure I passed, of course.» (Great extent)

24. To what extent has the peer assessment of the assignment reports (assessments of our report by your fellow students and your assessment of your fellow student´,s reports) been of help for your lea

15 svarande

Small extent»2 13%
Some extent»9 60%
Large extent»4 26%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

- This was really pretty unnecessary, an extra load of work that didn"t really help.» (Small extent)

25. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»7 43%
Some extent»9 56%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.56

- It really didn"t seem relevant for the exam at all, I read some of the texts but I regard it as a waste of time, now.» (Small extent)
- Would be much better if there was a course compendium with the articles. Even if it"s not possible to include all articles, it is better to have some in the compendium and the rest for everyone to find for themselves. I think many people skipped reading them just because it is too much work.» (Some extent)

26. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»2 12%
Rather badly»1 6%
Rather well»12 75%
Very well»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- The information during the course was very unclear and came always quite late.» (Very badly)
- The organization of the course was really unclear. I also had throughout the most of the course the feeling, that the teachers are not really interested in the students and the course itself.» (Very badly)

Study climate

27. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 12%
Rather good»8 50%
Very good»5 31%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

28. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»3 18%
Very well»12 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Some of them would not work hard on it » (Rather poorly)

29. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 6%
Adequate»9 56%
High»3 18%
Too high»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- It could be much better communication between the ones responsible for the assignments. It is just annoying and pointless when the deadline for assignment 3 is on the same day as the deadline for second hand-in for assignment 2.» (High)
- Way too high! I have never, in my four years at Chalmers worked this hard with a single coarse.» (Too high)

30. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 25%
Adequate»4 25%
High»2 12%
Too high»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- I only read one course» (Low)
- combination with CFD course» (Too high)
- I also studied the CFD which is a very timeconsuming coarse, so to be honest, this study period was terribly stressful!» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

31. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»3 18%
Fair»5 31%
Adequate»4 25%
Good»4 25%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- Too much focus on the assignments, which are far to extensive and too many for the short time avaliable. Unclear what the requirements to pass the exam are, since the projects are all we have done.» (Poor)
- The assignments could be much better organized. At some points we worked on three assignments at the same time, that"s just not good in any way.» (Fair)
- The general idea of the coarse, as a project coarse is good. But skip the exam, it really doesn"t have anything in common with the rest of the coarse.» (Adequate)

32. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Some of the assignments, e.g. assignment 2 and 4. But more focus on fewer assignments. The course only has so many hours...»
- Ass3, Ass2»
- All the assessments on the other groups and to have the possibility to criticise and debate at each assignment.»
- Ass 3, 4 and 6 were good and gave an understanding for the coarse content.»
- Assignments 2, 4 and 6.»

33. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Fewer assignments, better administration - what is required etc... Lectures with a distinct purpose - this lecture is held to explain...»
- More help, more class hours on the martes and leap projects.»
- Completely change Ass 5, please. We spent a lot of time on it and it gave nothing. A more specific problem formulation could be a good start... A better problem description for assignment 2 is needed. Is there really a need to have an examination when so much time is required for the assignments? »
- Maybe skip one assignment (2?) to prevent so much overlapping?»
- Remove the exam.»

34. Additional comments

- The 60% limit on the exam is quite strange... It does not feel like bonus points, rather penalty points if you don"t get them. Better to have 50% and no bonus points compared to this.»
- To many assignments with to less time on each of them. It would be better to focus on one assignment and make it good. To few and to bad lectures.»
- How come we don"t know the bonus points before the exam. Assignment 6 I understand, but assignment 2 had a deadline three weeks before the exam!? Regarding assignment 2, it is just not okey to send out everyone"s results in an open letter!»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.25
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.41

Kursutvärderingssystem från