ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Real-time control systems, SSY190, ht11

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-03-07 - 2011-03-08
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 4%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 33%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 33%
100%»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 33%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»0 0%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Could be written as bullets. Does not match lectures very well. No grading-goals for the project. No information of why the handin should be done, if it"s graded and how it"s graded. » (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»1 33%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»1 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 33%
Rather good»1 33%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»1 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»2 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Handin totally unnecessary and useless. More than half of the time went to just installing and getting the toolbox to work, once it got running not much could(or had to) be done with it except plotting the desired curves. The questions themselves were rather trivial and only required a well formulated answer without much consideration or calculations. In other words, a waste of time right when the projects were in their most critical stage. Projects started too late. Deadline of modeling report too early.» (Adequate)
- depends on how much effort was put on the project since it was very free.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 33%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Good to finally get some practical projects to work on. That"s rare throughout the education.» (Fair)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Lego Mindstorm projects»
- Projects»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More consultation sessions»
- Remove handin. Need more sensors for almost all projects. Fixed hardware and specifications for the projects would be good. Too long/many group presentations, 3.5h of failed ballbots can kill anyone. Would be nice with some followup on the lab, just a lecture with would be good, doesn"t have to be another lab session.»

16. Additional comments

- Not so many interesting CONTROL problems for the projects, most were just algorithmic problems that could be precalculated offline except for the ballbot and the bike. Too many ballbots, it"s too hard and they require too many sensors that other groups could use, you shouldnt do a 2d segway before you"ve even managed to do a 1d. Too much lectures about trivial computer science topics such as basic multi-threading, mutex and fixed/floating point arithmetics. If i recall correctly this was thought in our first year of the bachelor(Z). A quick recap would be enough instead of 4 2h lectures. And then focus more on the advanced topics.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från