ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

New venture formation (GIBBS GU Sahlgrenska), CIP036

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-21 - 2011-01-31
Antal svar: 2
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 66%
Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»

Your own effort

1. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

2 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 50%
100%»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Maybe I missed one occation» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

2 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 100%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 50%
Yes, definitely»1 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- A large part is on the indivdual tasks, I think it is too large becuase they stod for a smaller part of the course» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

4. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

2 svarande

Small extent»1 50%
Some extent»1 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

5. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

2 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 50%
Rather well»1 50%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Study climate

6. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

2 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 50%
Very good»1 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Very quick respons on email which I value highly» (Very good)

7. How was the course workload?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Lectures

8. Course introduction/Intellectual Assets and appropriation (Erik Hansson)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. Title clearance and background foreground analysis/collaboration and external technology development (Andrew Telles)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. Becoming an employer (Maria Winckler, MAQS)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 50%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

11. Disclosure Sensitivity Analysis (Lars Andersson)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

12. Product Development Workshop (Pascal Le Masson, MINES ParisTech)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

13. Branding and concept development (Toni-Matti Karjalainen, Aalto University)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

14. Conceptual implementations of business models (Andrew Telles)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- We have had similar stuff in other lectures» (Adequate)

15. Legal Due Diligence (Emma Olnäs Fors, Mannheimer Swartling)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 50%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Good slides but too much and quick talk, more case based excerices» (Fair)

16. Business due diligence (Erik Hedenryd, Volvo technology transfer)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»1 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- It didnt really feel like a part of the course, it was more like a company presentation» (Adequate)

17. Tessera tech (Erik Hansson)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 50%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

18. The firm as a nexus of contracts (Lars Andersson)

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 50%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

- Very understandable and good with the three hour personal writing, al though as I mentioned maybe a too big part of the grade» (Excellent)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Individual writing, it is a nice contrast»

21. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The individual writing should maybe atnd for 40 points in total, 20 each»

Kursutvärderingssystem från