ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Vibration Control 2010, TME145

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2011-01-04 - 2011-01-23
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57%
Kontaktperson: Viktor Berbyuk»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

<15 hours/week» 6 54%

Around 20 hours/week» 4 36%

Around 30 hours/week» 0 0%

Around 40 hours/week» 1 9%

>50 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.63

- Computer assignments take too much time. I never had time to read the book and do the exercises. Not until the last two weeks.» (Around 40 hours/week)

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

11 svarande

<25%» 2 18%

25-50%» 2 18%

50-75%» 0 0%

>75%» 7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

Teaching and course administration

3. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 3 27%

Large extent» 6 54%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- Good teacher» (Large extent)

4. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 18%

Large extent» 8 72%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Concise and educational book» (Great extent)

5. Was the course literature worth its price?

Do you consider that the course literature was worth its price? As a guideline the student union at Chalmers has set is at 70 sKr/hp.

11 svarande

1 (not worth it)» 0 0%

2» 2 18%

3» 2 18%

4» 1 9%

5 (well worth it)» 6 54%

Did not buy the litterature» 0

Genomsnitt: 4

- Definately price-worthy. Much better than other course literature three or four time its price that turn out worthless.» (5 (well worth it))

6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 5 45%

Very well» 6 54%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 3 27%

Very good» 6 54%

I did not seek help» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- The rotation of the TAs should be regulated by writing a queue on the board and allocating a fixed maximum time per group.» (Rather good)
- Did not seek help, but both teacher and TA"s encouraged it and set a comfortable atmosphere. » (I did not seek help)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 3 27%

Very well» 6 54%

I did not seek cooperation» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

9. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

1 (Too low)» 0 0%

2» 1 9%

3» 4 36%

4» 5 45%

5 (Too high)» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Adequate.» (4)

Summarizing questions

10. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

11 svarande

1 (not at all)» 0 0%

2» 0 0%

3» 5 45%

4» 3 27%

5 (very well)» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

11. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 9%

Adequate» 2 18%

Good» 7 63%

Excellent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- Interesting course. » (Good)

12. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs as they are»
- The course teaching and lab projects were good.»
- Everything»
- Lab sessions + computer assignments»

13. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- there should be only one hand-in»
- I think for a vibration control course it was good but could get a little more advanced, maybe you could change the last part of the course first integral method also. »
- Too many labs.»
- The labs should be changed so as to give more practical insight.»
- The computer assignment were very good practice and challenging but took too much time. Either some how make it shorter or have it so that if you pass the assignments you pass the course and the final will be optional. There is way to much work put into these assignments which is not really recognized. Also I would have want to get feedback on the assignments even though I pass them. I want to know what was good and what might have been better. »

14. Additional comments

- The overall course structure was good. However, the teacher can make lectures more interesting.»
- Sometimes I would get lost at lectures. It would be better that the teacher would write more of what he is saying on the board. Usually he would explain something in words and then only write the formulas down. So if you missed what he was saying it was hard to guess what formula he was writing down and what it ment and so on. So it was really hard to relate to the notes when I read them afterwards for the exam.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.81

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.81
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.7

Kursutvärderingssystem från