|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Technology based entrepreneurship, CIP016/TEK066Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2010-12-14 - 2010-12-22 Antal svar: 21 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Anna Tullsten»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.04 - Svårt att estimera när jag inte har klart för mig vilka assignments som hörde till vilken kurs (dtim eller tbe). Jag har upplevelsrn att dtim var mycket kortare, dock väldigt intensiv med mkt läsning. Jag väljer 25h/v då jag antar att all läsning hört till dtim. (om man räknar med trott-läsning i tbe skulle det bli ca 2h mer i veckan)» (Around 25 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.85 - I was luckily never ill during the semester. » (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.04 - The grading system was unclear. During the course, we have been given contradicting (if any) information about which assignments are graded and how they are graded.» (The goals are difficult to understand) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Reasonable but difficult when you don"t have a I eng background» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?18 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.66 - The assessment criteria was at times diffuse...» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.76 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.14 - Where there any course literature?» (Small extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.04 - Mixed messages from faculty in regards to hand-outs. » (Rather badly) Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - Conflicting information, hard to get answers» (Rather poor) 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - Some more groupe dynamics would have been good» (Rather well) 11. How was the course workload?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - It was high, as well it should be. » (High) 12. How was the total workload this study period?21 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.09 - Perfect! I expected a lot! And got a lot!!» (High) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?20 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - I have learned so much practical knowledge ans tools that can be applied in real life situtations » (Excellent) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Group assignments and individual business plan»- Investor negotiations» - The BP, and negotiations with VC"c and lawers!» - The simulations with investors, lawyers etc. The different cases.» - The negotiation with lawyers and investors, and the shreholders agreement» - The general structure. The assignments were really good and I learned a lot. » - The group work tasks» - The Lectures.» - Investor presentation» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- thorough feedback and one excellent example that students can learn from»- More presentation, presentation training. As well as at least one lecture on market analysis» - More feedback would be good!» - Maybe we can switch groups when we are working in class. The reason to get some variation since we are working so much in our project groups anyway.» - Give a better chance to consult the idea provider» - Details around hand-ins should be communicated more clearly. It"s ok if the "overall goals" of an assignment are unclear (as this could be part of the learning), but things like deadlines, schedule and hand-in format details should be more clear than they have been. » - Availability of information relevant for the projects» - Less group work.» - Make the grading criterias clearer, perhaps reassess the order of the assignments» - A group assignment including assessment of the market would have been really helpful when writing the business plan.» - the friday seminars» - Maybe clearer communication of assignments content. Change the assignmentsweek to sync with when we are reading about the different chapters in DTIM. » 16. Additional comments- Good job TBE team!»- I am very happy with the course!»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%