Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Nanoscience MCC026, MPNAN, HT2010, MCC026

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-08 - 2011-01-23
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 77%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 28%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»1 14%
Around 30 hours/week»2 28%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 28%
100%»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.71

- I missed one lecture.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»7 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 14%
Yes, definitely»5 71%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 14%
Large extent»4 57%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»4 66%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3

- There was no course literature.» (?)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»3 42%
Very well»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 14%
Rather good»1 14%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Because of the switching of lecturers.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»5 71%
Very well»1 14%
I did not seek cooperation»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 28%
Adequate»4 57%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 14%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- Because of one extra course.» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»5 71%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 4

- The lectures are good but the examination is a bit silly, because it is just learning by heart question.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the variety of topics in the lecture list»
- All of the parts should be preserved.»
- its coverage of different aspects of nanoscience.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Getting course literature and maybe you can make it one course instead of 15 one-lecture courses.»
- many calculations in quantum transport home assignments »
- There should be a larger number homework assignements available. These problems should also be made a bit more complex and interesting. Also, each of the lecturers ought to provide extra reading material in addition to the recommended papers. Finally, the exam should not be based on the same questions that were provided has homework, since at present little incentive is given to study all the material that discussed during the lectures.»
- no change needed.»

16. Additional comments

- was pleasant to have a very responsible and carefull course organization»
- no comments.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från