ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Image analysis, SSY095, H10

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-06 - 2011-01-03
Antal svar: 29
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 31%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

29 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 20%

Around 20 hours/week» 12 41%

Around 25 hours/week» 5 17%

Around 30 hours/week» 5 17%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- All my classes collided with other courses.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- First two weeks of lecture are too similar to image processing course.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

29 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 4 13%

50%» 2 6%

75%» 11 37%

100%» 12 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.06

- Missed two guest lectures.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

29 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 7 24%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 15 51%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 7 24%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

26 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 7%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 22 84%

No, the goals are set too high» 2 7%

Genomsnitt: 2

- missclicked.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

26 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 9 34%

Yes, definitely» 10 38%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 7 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- Examination is too long. Removing 1 problem should be good. Exam contains too much computing questions, and not enough understanding questions. » (To some extent)
- the exam was far too focused on the counting machinery and the general understanding of image analysis was barely tested at all. Too much with 6 questions of that size.» (To some extent)
- examination was a lit bit hard, upper than the taught level» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

29 svarande

Small extent» 7 24%

Some extent» 8 27%

Large extent» 13 44%

Great extent» 1 3%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- the lectures are slow and boring. The information in the course could be increased if the lecturer were more efficient during his teaching time.» (Small extent)
- Some times lecture are going to slow on some obvious part and too fast and more technical stuff. Doing more exercises during lectures or having exercices session would be good.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

28 svarande

Small extent» 3 10%

Some extent» 11 39%

Large extent» 10 35%

Great extent» 4 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- Just a small part of the book is used for this course.» (Small extent)
- The lecture notes contain all the information you need to pass the labs.» (Large extent)
- The labs were very good and gave a good understanding of some analysis methods.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

29 svarande

Very badly» 1 3%

Rather badly» 1 3%

Rather well» 17 58%

Very well» 10 34%

Genomsnitt: 3.24

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

29 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 1 3%

Rather good» 7 24%

Very good» 18 62%

I did not seek help» 3 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.79

- often two tutors during the labs which gave time for questions.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

28 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 5 17%

Rather well» 6 21%

Very well» 13 46%

I did not seek cooperation» 4 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

28 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 3 10%

Adequate» 16 57%

High» 6 21%

Too high» 2 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.17

- The content in this course is a joke. It could at least be doubled. If the image processing course were mandatory for this course the first part of this coulrse could be discarded and more content could be added.» (Too low)
- It was too heavily shifted towards the end, put the labs earlier!» (Adequate)
- The labs took in general a lot more than 4 hours.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

29 svarande

Too low» 1 3%

Low» 1 3%

Adequate» 14 48%

High» 8 27%

Too high» 5 17%

Genomsnitt: 3.51

- I took 3 courses.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

29 svarande

Poor» 2 6%

Fair» 3 10%

Adequate» 9 31%

Good» 13 44%

Excellent» 2 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.34

- Less math course, more implementations.» (Adequate)
- Lectures was kind of bad, was neither applied or theoretical. Very slow tempo on the lectures. » (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- labs»
- The Labs, learned a lot from them, best part of the course»
- labs, project»
- the guest lectures.»
- The guest lectures were awsome!»
- segmentation»
- sure»
- Guest lecture sessions,it was pretty more applicable rather than the lectures ...»
- guest lectures»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- add more image analysis content. New lecturer. Try to get companies that talk about their techniques instead of giving us the standard sales talk from the sales department.»
- maybe the labs can be take some points in the exam»
- Get a more inspiring lecturer who can keep to a straight path»
- weightage/mark split among labs,project and exam. More weightage can be given to labs and project than its given presently. Everyone"s goal will be to understand and do a good project and hence weightage must be given accordignly. »
- removing projects. Having exercises session.»
- even distribution of workload over the whole course. Remove either tentamina or project.»
- Artur should attend one of Alessandro Romeos Image Processing lectures to get som inspiration of teaching methods.»
- There should be bonus Marks for the labs as well.»
- I think it"s fine now»
- adding a tutor class beside the teaching for solving and asking the question by a PhD student »
- the teacher,as he couldn"t speake in English fluently,but I beleive his knowledge aboute the course was great »

16. Additional comments

- none»
- Focus more on the funcion and implementation and less on the underlying math.»
- Teacher was little bad in Speaking English. Though he had good knowlegde. Labs are little tough. Overall course was Ok»
- no comment»

Kursutvärderingssystem från