ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Integrated Product Development, TEK150

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-16 - 2011-01-06
Antal svar: 38
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: lars trygg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

38 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 9 23%

Around 20 hours/week» 16 42%

Around 25 hours/week» 10 26%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 7%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- This was a very good course load as it allowed ample time for us to concentrate on something which we did not understand and on the other subject.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- This course had the lowest priority among the ones i was taking.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- 139h in total» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

37 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 2 5%

75%» 15 40%

100%» 20 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.48

- I couldn"t attend in the most lectures due to my illness which I experienced to be a greatloss of mine since I totally believe in Lars"s lectures to be very rich in terms of pedagogy and also his ability to capture the mind of the student while teaching.» (?)
- Se question 1» (50%)
- due to tarvelling, otherwise 100%» (75%)
- or close to 100%» (100%)
- missed one class due to outstation trip.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

38 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 3 7%

The goals are difficult to understand» 1 2%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 13 34%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 21 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Its hard to say how the goals can be better specified.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

37 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 3 8%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 34 91%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

- With my background from mechanical engineering i have a vast experience from product development and the goals could have been set higher for me.» (No, the goals are set too low)
- Absolutelt reasonable and so very related to the overall programme. The very right choice of the book fullfilled me expectation from the programme as a whole as well.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

36 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 10 27%

Yes, definitely» 15 41%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 11 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.02

- Really hope so!!!!» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

38 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 8 21%

Large extent» 24 63%

Great extent» 6 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.94

- I have only participadet in a small part of the lectures but those i attended where good.» (Some extent)
- Especially the literature seminars but also in general» (Large extent)
- especially literature seminars» (Large extent)
- As mentioned above lars has a total ability tocapture the mind and attention of the student with his applicable examples and also his very learnable experiences of real situations.» (Great extent)
- Especially the literature seminars were really good!» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

38 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 3 7%

Large extent» 27 71%

Great extent» 8 21%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- The book is very good, however i cant help questioning if there isnt a newer one that is just as good.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

37 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 5%

Rather well» 23 62%

Very well» 12 32%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- It can"t be hard to have more order among the files. Eg labelling properly (especially the topic reports in a consistent way) and making folders for subgroups of files. Also, it should be possible to have lecture notes distributed before class. Some teacher say that they bring them in hard copies if they fail in delivering 24 hours ahead. Even better, some teachers always bring them in hard copies, but that might be waste..» (Rather badly)
- The schedule was not in time edit format but in a .doc files which i do not prefer as it is not compatible with outlook.» (Rather well)
- There were problems with the schedule since the administration didn"t use the schedule function of the webpage, but instead used a separate document. It was not always clear if that document document was updated due to changes.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

38 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 2 5%

Rather good» 7 18%

Very good» 25 65%

I did not seek help» 4 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- I found the climate very open and the teachers where eager to answer questions.» (Very good)
- Lars has always been patient while comming to the questions from the students letting then talk and react in the classroom. This is based on my previous part of the course we had with Lars. As mentioned before I couldnt" attend that much of the lectures at this quarter due to my illness.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

38 svarande

Very poorly» 3 7%

Rather poorly» 5 13%

Rather well» 17 44%

Very well» 13 34%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Amazing. This was catastrophe and not decent working environment. This was not ok. And I partly blame the teachers, it can"t be a totally new area?!» (Very poorly)
- I think that there is to much variation in the skills of the students. Some are not proficient enough in english and in writing an essay.» (Rather poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

38 svarande

Too low» 1 2%

Low» 3 7%

Adequate» 29 76%

High» 5 13%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- As with most courses i have taken the last few years in Chalmers the workload is not high enough to ensure that only qualified students graduate.» (Too low)
- I think, it was more my laziness, that prevented me from more success.» (Adequate)
- Very reasonable and rather fair to the students.» (Adequate)
- Apart from physical and severe emotional stress from the group work, amount of materials was good.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

37 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 2 5%

Adequate» 18 48%

High» 14 37%

Too high» 3 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.48

- The "other course" had a very high workload in question of amount of material.» (High)
- I have had to many commitments this period but the workload from Chalmers has not been to high.» (Too high)
- I believe it was way way way tooooooo high. I feel totally brainwashed in way and it seems like the school leaves farily very minor space for the students to be critical while reading and learning. The study path seems to be very frozen from the begining and no flexbility is felt. I believe it"s due to the very old methods that the teachers follow at this school. No use of this high load of the litterature while we do not learn how to apply them. But I have to mention that this view of mine concern the whole programme and not Lars"s course by any chance. I have a very optimistic point of view about the usage of this course in my future to come as I have talked to some students having this course with Lars in the past years.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

38 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 9 23%

Good» 18 47%

Excellent» 11 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.05

- The course is good but i dont think it should have been mandatory as I am only in the program for the quality part.» (Adequate)
- The help for the projects should have been better» (Adequate)
- course literature was very boring, not to say it wasn"t educative» (Good)
- I loved the product development game.» (Good)
- Again, course was really good. Even though I still feel I miss the linkings between the areas. Eg, I know of a half dozen ways of organizing development work, but I can"t really see all linkings in between. But course was very good, except for the group work as stated.» (Good)
- good learning scope of product development. games and exercises were great help. plus, literature seminar is always interesting. » (Good)
- in comparison to germany» (Excellent)
- Very interesting subject, and the lectures complemented the literature in a stimulating way» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- literature exams and lectures by Lars Trygg»
- Lean Development Game! It was brilliant! The other Workshop! And of course the literature seminars. I think this is the best way to transfer the material to the students. Although the literature seminar is not mandatory a lot of students participate regularly. Almost the whole group of students is very ambitious and use such a opportunity to get more insight to the material. The discussion in small groups with Lars were helpful and of big benefit. Keep it up! »
- i really liked the course, especially the games, topic report/8 pages was a good lenghts»
- the game are really good»
- Even though i attended only one litterature seminare I think the option of having them is great. It shows the dedication of the teachers and give the students a chance for deeper learning.»
- Literature Seminars Lean Game Workshop»
- The product development game, guest lectures.»
- Thel literature seminars»
- DFA workshop, literature seminars»
- literature seminars, games, guest lectures.»
- Seminar Reviews»
- The product development game »
- the litterature seminars»
- Workshops»
- the methodology and the structure of the course programm»
- 1)Topic Report 2)Two Games »
- The activities such as the game, the DFA analysis.»
- Seminars,team work and giving good lectures»
- the development game»
- more technical issues regarding product development, not just the way to behave in teams»
- - The games included in the course. they were so useful for me to get the real feeling of the topic in a practical way. - The literature seminars.»
- well the learning and teaching is ok »
- Case work, essay questions on the exam ad the game.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- no need for changes»
- the book takes too much time to explain few things. Can be changed if there is a better one.»
- I cant think of anything at the moment.»
- Guest Lectures which do not focus on the subject and deviate too much, especially by consultants.»
- More importance of the topic report in the evaluation, insted of only 5 bonus points, if the examination is passed. Smaller groups for the topic reports, maybe 4 persons or 3, but the maybe always two groups with the same topic, that only present together, but write their own report.»
- Making own groups for the topic reports»
- Group work! Let the international students have mandatory courses in case writing, references, group work and more. Or at least have an individual case to start with so that you (teachers) get aware of, at least part of, the situation.»
- separate evaluation of students, individually, before assigning to group tasks, like topic reports, to ensure fairness during grading. »
- More opportunities for discussions (like Seminar Reviews)»
- Cannot really see anything to be changed»
- Sometimes the guest lectures are not so relevant or very related to the other part of the course»
- Nothing»
- 1)No compulsion in literature seminars. 2)Limitation of two pages per question in exam. »
- More lectures could be a good idea.»
- Teachers should be more warm-hearted and strict with students.»
- use the schedule function of the web page. It"s much easier when every course uses the same framework»
- Nothing in mind.»
- the teaching material is not sufficient and if possible add some more reference materials»

16. Additional comments

- Nothing against product development itself, it is certainly a great subject, but I took this program becuase it"s about operations management and quality management. The product development part should be optional for the students of this program, and not compulsory.»
- More Simulation exercises be added.»
- Thank you for this course!»
- Merry Christmas!!!»
- topic report preparation and process was very educative. but too much stress was put on swedish students by seeking for information and help on unfamiliar areas of learning. capability inequality of individuals makes group work extremely stressful and difficult, eg. command of english, comprehension, amount of time and energy contributed. this leads to unfair grading of individulas based on group performance. »
- nil»
- 1) Literature is excellent.»
- »
- it was good but i was expecting some thing more engineering than just how to choose teams to work with, this is not even industrial engineering, this is management»
- in general the course is very muuch interestng and for the future it is better to make it practical oriented »

Kursutvärderingssystem från