Visa resultat

Product Life Cycle Management PPU110, PPU110

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

19 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 20 hours/week»		3		15%
Around 25 hours/week»		11		57%
Around 30 hours/week»		4		21%
At least 35 hours/week»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- But absolutely more hours spent at the end. In the beginning difficult to make progress in project without supervision.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- Most of the time for the project» (Around 30 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

19 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		1		5%
50%»		4		21%
75%»		4		21%
100%»		10		52%

Genomsnitt: 4.21

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		3		16%
The goals are difficult to understand»		1		5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		4		22%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		10		55%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		12		75%
No, the goals are set too high»		4		25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		5%
To some extent»		11		64%
Yes, definitely»		4		23%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		1		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.29

- It is like two different courses, the project and the duggas.» (To some extent)
- There are a lot of information in the lecture handouts, but the dugga just examine a little pice of that. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		2		10%
Some extent»		8		42%
Large extent»		6		31%
Great extent»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- excellent class, things i never saw before, totally multidisciplinary.» (Great extent)
- The supervisors for the PLM-project were really helpful. When asking the teacher though it wasn"t that helpful, regardless of what you asked.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		4		21%
Some extent»		9		47%
Large extent»		3		15%
Great extent»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- Did not read the articles and it was not necessary to pass the course» (Small extent)
- out of the compendium, half great articles, half useless. » (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		0		0%
Rather badly»		1		5%
Rather well»		13		68%
Very well»		5		26%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- The project description is quite confused since I don"t know where to start.» (Rather well)

Project

9. What is your opinion about the project work?

Poor»		2		10%
Fair»		2		10%
Adequate»		8		42%
Good»		4		21%
Excellent»		3		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- I dont see the point of this project, why is this a mandatory course?!» (Poor)
- A lot of time was spent making everything work. The step from grade 3 to grade 4 is also too big.» (Fair)
- Spent too much trying to fix the CATIA models, they were very badly made.» (Adequate)
- A majority of the time is spent on fixing bugs, errors and backups etc. and not on activities related to the course goals. One however understands a plm/pdmsystem rather well.» (Adequate)
- The software requires alot of patience. Perhaps it would be preferable to use one that is further developed and more stabile.» (Adequate)
- Too few hours of supervising the project. Wanted the two hours on Wednesdays to also be supervised. At least for us limited to the prototype lab"s computers. Too much we had to look up on our own how to do things. Very time inefficient and do not always contribute the better learning!! The scripts and CAD we received was far from being usable. A lot of things had to be changed. The papers we bought did not give any help on how to run the processes. And why didn"t you say exactly how the bat-file and Catia macro files should look like to start them?? This only costs us all a lot of time.» (Adequate)
- There was a little too much programming involved at the end of the project in a language that has not been included in the education earlier. Also, it could have been good to try the user interface yourself prior to starting the project so that you know what to expect and how to use the system.» (Adequate)
- I like it includes knowledge from previous courses» (Excellent)
- I learnt a lot from that.» (Excellent)

10. Did you get adequate supervision?

No, not at all»		1		5%
To some extent»		6		31%
Yes, definitely»		12		63%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Too few hours of supervising the project. Wanted the two hours on Wednesdays to also be supervised. At least for us limited to the prototype lab"s computers. » (To some extent)
- Very good and helpful supervisors, at least Mattias and Anna who were the one I went to. » (Yes, definitely)

11. Were the tutorial materials helpful?

No, not at all»		2		10%
To some extent»		8		42%
Yes, definitely»		9		47%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- Difficult to read, information was missing in some places.» (No, not at all)
- to late in the course and only coverd basic functionality» (No, not at all)
- The course could have comprised more on scripting since it"s such an important part of configuring a system.» (To some extent)
- smarteam is not well used by anyone, not the students, not the teacher, not the ta» (To some extent)
- wanted more on running the processes» (To some extent)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		1		5%
Rather good»		6		31%
Very good»		12		63%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Not so helpful and available.» (Rather good)

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		0		0%
Rather poorly»		0		0%
Rather well»		6		31%
Very well»		13		68%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

14. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		7		36%
High»		10		52%
Too high»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- If you don"t try for a higher grade than 3.» (Adequate)
- Only because the programming part took very much of the projects time even for simple code since we are used to matlab or java and that the system can"t cope with all Visual basic commands. You even have to change the info you find on the web.» (High)
- The lecture and duggas was not so demanded, but the project took some time. » (High)
- Because of the high uncertainty of how to do things.» (Too high)

15. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		1		5%
Adequate»		8		42%
High»		8		42%
Too high»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Schedule collided with all lectures etc in my other course, Sustainable development, which made the workload high.» (High)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		3		15%
Fair»		1		5%
Adequate»		7		36%
Good»		6		31%
Excellent»		2		10%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

19. Additional comments