Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Random processes with applications, MVE135, HT2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-11 - 2010-10-25
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 53%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 28%
Around 20 hours/week»7 33%
Around 25 hours/week»5 23%
Around 30 hours/week»3 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 4%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 23%
100%»15 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.61

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 4%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»11 52%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»6 30%
Yes, definitely»9 45%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»11 55%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»9 42%
Large extent»9 42%
Great extent»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»16 80%
Very well»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»6 28%
Very good»12 57%
I did not seek help»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 10%
Rather well»5 25%
Very well»12 60%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»14 66%
High»6 28%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»8 38%
High»10 47%
Too high»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»9 42%
Good»12 57%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

- Excellent lectures, but badly organized exercise sessions.» (Adequate)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- the laborations»
- the dynamic lectures and time for consultations»
- plan of lectures»
- lab assignments»
- The two laborations by Mats, The content of the course»
- The teacher was new and we had no idea about how would be his exam and this the worst thing in this course.»
- Laboratory Projects»
- everything»
- The lecturer»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More lectures by Mats Viberg»
- Exercise sessions certainly need improvement. Maybe discussing and solving problems in small groups of students would be a good idea.»
- more contents off the book»
- Exercise session should have to review theory first and after that solve the problems. Already solutions to the exercises available in the course page. So no need to solve the questions again. Need more application specific information rather than theory approach.»
- Laboratory Projects should be graded»
- nothing»
- Course material»

16. Additional comments

- Thanks to Patrik Albin and Mats Viberg!»
- None»

Kursutvärderingssystem från