ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


ENM055 - Electric drives I , ENM055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-10-11 - 2010-10-31
Antal svar: 45
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 54%
Kontaktperson: Valborg Ekman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

45 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 11%
Around 20 hours/week»13 28%
Around 25 hours/week»15 33%
Around 30 hours/week»7 15%
At least 35 hours/week»5 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- the volume of lessons are high,specially forthe first quarter and when students are not stable in their new life.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

45 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 2%
50%»0 0%
75%»12 26%
100%»32 71%

Genomsnitt: 4.66

- course clashed with others» (75%)
- 75% of lectures, 25% of tutorials » (75%)
- 90 %» (100%)
- Except one lecture. » (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

45 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 2%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»9 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»32 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- specially for the lab activities we should spend more time and be slower.i suppose we were in hurry during the lab activities.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- Almost perfect goals» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

44 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 4%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»41 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 2%

Genomsnitt: 1.97

- Maybe a bit to easy in the first weeks» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

45 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»11 24%
Yes, definitely»30 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Too many guidelines in the exam and many questions that have been explicitly answered in lectures. The exam tested more of "memorising knowledge" than real understanding.» (To some extent)
- A lot of questions on the exams where too trivial. They didn"t test your understanding. True/false questions doesn"t feel serious enough. The underlining task was just confusing. Better if you"re asked to describe something or give arguments for something.» (To some extent)
- Perfectly» (Yes, definitely)
- The trial exam was a good exercise that assessed the whole course so far.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

45 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»10 22%
Large extent»21 46%
Great extent»14 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

- This course was repetition from previous courses taken at chalmers.» (Some extent)
- Very good» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

45 svarande

Small extent»4 8%
Some extent»8 17%
Large extent»21 46%
Great extent»12 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- didn"t have the book...» (Small extent)
- Mostly excerices» (Some extent)
- The handed out paper became more like a mess but that was probably my fault» (Large extent)
- I did not buy the book, nor read it, but the hand-outs were useful aswell as old exams. I learned the whole course in the last week while doing old exams. Before that I hardly knew anything about the course...» (Large extent)
- The lecture handouts have been very good. Haven"t read so much in the book.» (Large extent)
- Wonderful book - it taught me everything! » (Great extent)
- The literature corresponded well to the course content. It was easy to follow.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

44 svarande

Very badly»2 4%
Rather badly»2 4%
Rather well»13 29%
Very well»27 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

- pga att studentportalen inte funkar stora delar av dygnet» (Very badly)
- Handouts were great, the web page did not run quite a few times, but that may be due to the student portal. » (Rather badly)
- Portal seemed to always be down or extremely slow. couldn"t access ping pong pages frequently. very frustrating.» (Rather badly)
- chalmers it system is crap, was down for long time» (Rather well)
- It would be better if all tutorial solutions were put up on the web and faster.» (Rather well)
- It"s great to have slides (and printouts of them), so that one can listen instead of taking notes, and notes can be taken on the slides. Perfect.» (Very well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

45 svarande

Very poor»3 6%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 17%
Very good»30 66%
I did not seek help»4 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- The exercise sessions were all about solving tutorials, which I found were very hard to follow (because of Tariks handwriting & speed) and frankly not that useful. It would be good if there was a possibility of asking questions.» (Very poor)
- Even though there were many students in the class, there was time to ask questions in the break. Also during the labs there were not problems getting assistance. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

45 svarande

Very poorly»1 2%
Rather poorly»1 2%
Rather well»16 35%
Very well»27 60%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- The labs (1 and 2) were overbooked and there was too many persons in the room. We were 5 persons at our bench, which is not optimal.» (Rather well)
- I studied mostly on my own, but worked together with other students in the labs.» (Rather well)
- But unfortunately only with people from my own country.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

45 svarande

Too low»2 4%
Low»1 2%
Adequate»23 51%
High»16 35%
Too high»3 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Repetition» (Too low)
- Could have been higher. » (Low)
- Somewhat demanding labs.» (High)
- A LOT of material. Arguably too much to try and cover and actually retain the knowledge moving forward. Time will tell.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

45 svarande

Too low»1 2%
Low»1 2%
Adequate»16 35%
High»18 40%
Too high»9 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.73

- The other course took all of my time, I didnt have time to do anything but the hand-in assignments in the other course. Also the reason why I couldn"t study for the trial exam properly.» (Too high)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

45 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 4%
Adequate»5 11%
Good»25 55%
Excellent»13 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

- It"s to basic, one already know almost everything.» (Adequate)
- better time management in presenting lectures and not giving too much lectures ,and focusing more on lab activities.» (Good)
- The computer lab was a bit hard to understand.» (Good)
- The exam was a bit inconsistent.» (Good)
- I would recommend this course to those who are interested in electrical engineering. I was not at all interested in electric machines when I started this course (I chose it because I need 30 hp of electrical engineering at master"s level), but I am definitely much more interested now and I do not regret one bit that I chose it. The course promotes the field of electric drives very well.» (Excellent)
- One of the best course that I have taken at Chalmers, the teachers were very good» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Sonja, the book, the hand-outs being handed out before the class starts...very good!»
- The labs (the short lab report was superb)»
- almost everything, it"s hard to figure out»
- labs were very good, good with half time exam»
- Everything but...»
- The professor who was very good teacher. Handouts were good.»
- Trial exam»
- The lab and the lab report. The good lecture slides.»
- Sonja is a very good lecturer. keep her!!»
- That Tarik did a little lecture before the tutorial. Very good! And the pictures and video on the home page.»
- Tarik»
- The true/false quizzes at the lectures. Both fun and it feels like you take an active part in the lectures.»
- the course materials and handouts. »
- Nothing»
- Slides, so one doesn"t have to take notes.»
- Handouts, trial exam. »
- Lab 1 video»
- same contents»
- Lab test, trial exam, the teachers»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Increased number of pages allowed for the lab report, and the possibility to dispose the structure more freely. Very unchallanging with these strict guidelines for the report. More computer simulation assignments would be reasonable, to cover more machine types than only DC.»
- the tutorials, I found them to be bad and unnecessary.»
- Just the information in last parts related to special machines were not enough coherent.»
- Make the course more difficult. (I"m from Chalmers.)»
- the workload»
- Nothing»
- topics are many and are taught in a very short period of time. While this may seem like a common strategy, some of the subjects are rather memorized instead of "learnt". This can help us pass a test, but we will forget soon after.»
- The exam should better represent the focus of the course. It was a bit too simple.»
- I would not say definitely, but three experiments and just one computer lab occasion would be better. »
- Lab 2 - better instructions, maybe a video, I didn"t feel like I knew what to do, or what the goal was.»
- nothing»

16. Additional comments

- Practical work is good, more of that! »
- exams sould be a little harder»
- the general course was handled well.»
- It could be good idea to simulate different type of motors and students work with them to realize the differences and similarities.»
- I would welcome more quizes on the ping-pong. »
- Thought the material was very well prepared and presented. I learned a lot and appreciate the time put into this course.»

17. To what extent has the experimental work been of help for your learning

45 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»13 28%
Large extent»23 51%
Great extent»9 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

- Very well put together. Good that the three labs were so well connected. And it felt like it was relevant.» (Large extent)
- Make you reflect and think about we things happen.» (Great extent)

18. To what extent has the computer lab been of help for your learning?

44 svarande

Small extent»3 6%
Some extent»17 38%
Large extent»16 36%
Great extent»8 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

- also we did noe spend enough time for that,i suppose there should be discussions at classes about lab activites.» (Some extent)
- Helped me get some points on the exam...» (Some extent)
- It"s impossible to answer all questions in the lab PM rigorously with this extent of the report.» (Large extent)

19. To what extent has the trial exam been of help for your learning?

44 svarande

Small extent»1 2%
Some extent»6 13%
Large extent»21 47%
Great extent»16 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- It is nice to if you are on track...» (?)
- It was great to have a lot of time during the exam. I hadn"t studied that much for the trial, but learned things while I was figuring them out.» (Large extent)
- Don"t think I would have been on time with my studies without it.» (Great extent)

20. To what extent has the quizes in ping-pong been of help for your learning?

44 svarande

Small extent»4 9%
Some extent»11 25%
Large extent»20 45%
Great extent»9 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Haven"t used the web quiz.» (Small extent)
- Used it before the lab exam and it got me two extra points.» (Small extent)
- I just made the quiz before the lab, which helped me pass the lab questions.» (Small extent)
- I just took the lab-quiz. I have heard from others that the quizes were really good. Studieportalen didn"t work that good this study period» (Some extent)
- There could have been more of them. » (Large extent)

21. To what extent has the lab-report writing been of help for your learning?

45 svarande

Small extent»5 11%
Some extent»20 44%
Large extent»13 28%
Great extent»7 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.48

- I fail to see the reason for having a lab-report.» (Small extent)
- Actually I spent the most of my report making time with fitting it into the size of two pages. » (Small extent)
- Writing always helps you understand.» (Some extent)
- but most of the learing came when I and my friend discussed all experiments when doing the computer lab.» (Large extent)

22. To what extent did you use the lecture slides (put on the web page) to prepare yourself in advance of the lectures?

44 svarande

Small extent»16 36%
Some extent»4 9%
Large extent»14 31%
Great extent»10 22%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Because the lecture slides was handed out i didn"t look at them before the lecture. » (?)
- don"t have time to read before, but very good to have afterwards» (Small extent)
- Not in advance, but during the lecture as well as after when studying for the exam.» (Small extent)
- I looked though them quickly before some lectures. But the times I did, it helped me to be familiar with the content before the lecture. That"s very helpful, since you don"t have to struggle to take in things you haven"t seen before.» (Small extent)
- I don"t believe students have the time to print and prepare prior to classes. The workload is rather intense, and we are trying to just keep our head above water. That is at least my perception, of myself and listening to other students.» (Small extent)
- The slides are good, and it"s awesome that Sonja hand them out before every class.» (Great extent)



Kursutvärderingssystem från