Visa resultat

Advanced Passive Safety 2010, TME195

1. What is your general impression of the course?

Worst course ever»		1		16%
Fair»		1		16%
Adequate»		0		0%
Good»		3		50%
Excellent»		1		16%
Best course ever»		0		0%
No answer»		0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I found that the volume of topics covered was quite high. We had to study a lot of slides (~1000) for the exam. It would be better if you could pare down the content.» (Good)

2. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Poor»		0		0%
Fair»		0		0%
Acceptable»		0		0%
Good»		4		66%
Excellent»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

3. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		0		0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		4		100%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2

4. Do you think the course should cover more or fewer topics?

more»		1		16%
reasonable»		2		33%
fewer»		3		50%

Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- More car design instead of human body topics» (more)
- The content was too voluminous.» (fewer)
- Statistics and biology. I have really missed vehicle body structure.» (fewer)

5. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how difficult was the course?

very easy»		0		0%
easy»		0		0%
the same»		3		50%
difficult»		2		33%
very difficult»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- very lengthy subject with lots of topics (books and slides )» (difficult)
- too much of bio was not what i was looking for. I want more of vehicle structures and Crash Analysis !! » (very difficult)

6. How was the course workload?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		60%
High»		2		40%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

- but not devided evenly over the quarter. too much workload at the end of the course» (Adequate)

7. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		0		0%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		3		50%
High»		3		50%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

8. What is you general opinion about the assignmnet 1 (LS-Dyna)?

Poor»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		33%
Good»		4		66%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- It would be good to have developing the entire model as a part of the assignment as it would give experience in building models for analysis.» (Adequate)
- nice introduction for LS DYNA software» (Good)
- Very good - gives us an insight into how these tools are used. I think you could also include meshing and setting of all the matl props/boundary conditions.» (Good)
- I think it gives a good inpression about how it is like working with such a field in the industry» (Good)

9. What is you general opinion about the assignmnet 2 (Accidentology)?

Good»		1		16%
Acceptable»		3		50%
Marginal»		1		16%
Poor»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- Gives an idea of what databases exist and how it is used. The only unfavourable part was the limited number of cases to work with.» (Acceptable)
- I learned from it but it was very boring» (Acceptable)
- short time to acquaint with software» (Marginal)
- too low database entries and poor knowledge on access makes this assign worse . By changing the way i connect the tables, i can change the result i obtain !! Thats too confusing to begin with.» (Poor)

10. I learnt a lot from listening to presentations

I fully disagree»		0		0%
I disagree»		0		0%
I neither agree nor disagree»		1		16%
I agree»		2		33%
I fully agree»		2		33%
I did not attend»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Seeing how other teams deal with the same problem is a good way to learn, and to see a different approach.» (I fully agree)

11. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		1		16%
75%»		3		50%
100%»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

12. Please include a comment for each lecture that you have an opinion on (positive or negative)

- All the lectures were good. It would be good to decrease the human anatomy part and concentrate more on injury prevention strategies and have a some more depth in Vehicle Crashworthinesss. »
- the lectures from johan and karin were very good (good teachers and very on-topic) the lectures from Jac Wismans were very off-topic and he repeated a lot what was already said in previous lectures. the lectures from ola bostöm were very good, he"s a good teacher (good talker) and he told interesting things in a short amount of time. Anders Eugensson did a good lecture on a not so interesting subject. He mentioned good examples from real life experiences, which made the subject interesting. the lecture of lennart josefson was waaay above the level i could understand. Jikuang Yang was hard to understand, the slides of the lecture were confusing»
- Johan Davidson is strong in biology, so the questions for the exam were about this, it should be distributed more equally. FEM 1 by Linus Wågström was to deep a lot of studients did not catch this lesson. The most interesting lessons came from Volvo.»

13. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		20%
To some extent»		0		0%
Yes, definitely»		4		80%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- didnt take up the exam» (?)
- I have already filled the survey and forgotten to add: about 1080 slides, it is really to much for the exam preparation...» (?)
- Examination was about biology and statistics mostly, not about passive safety and vehicle.» (No, not at all)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?