ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Innovation Mangement Seminars 2010, IIN070

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-24 - 2010-06-06
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100%
Kontaktperson: Maria Elmquist»


Overall impression

1. What is your general impression of the course?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 7%
Quite good»2 15%
Very good»4 30%
Excellent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Poor)
- I really liked the idea(how it was structured) and the different subjects. » (Very good)
- I terms of the content of the course, it was quite good, personally I think that is one of the best I"ve had at Chalmers. However I was not that satisfied about the way hand-ins are graded.» (Excellent)
- I would strongly recommend the course. I learnt a lot and I liked the focus on academic learning, which I lacked when I started the course.» (Excellent)
- the course offers more than i expected!» (Excellent)

2. How was the course workload?*

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»7 53%
High»4 30%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Adequate)
- I always had something to do and I really liked how I was "forced" to read all the artciles, due to the deadlines. » (High)
- Even though the workload was high, it would be difficult to make a course with the same quality wiuth less workload so I would prefer to keep the workload as it is.» (High)

3. What do you think of the course administration?*

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 7%
Good»9 69%
Great»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (OK)
- I think there is room for some minor improvments, but my overall impression was that it was good. However, it is understandable as it was the first time the course was held. » (Good)

4. What do you think of the examination format (50% seminar hand-ins, 50% term paper)?*

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»1 7%
Rather good»2 15%
Good»6 46%
Excellent»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I was not that satisfied about the way hand-ins were graded. I think we should have our grades asap so we can know that what we are delivering could be improved, so for the next hand-in we could change and improve our grades... which is not possible because we got our grades until the end of the course when we could do nothing about it.» (Rather bad)
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather good)
- Maybe handins and participation represent a bigger part of the effort dedicated on the course, so it would fair if it had a bigger portion of the final grade. On the other hand, the term paper is where you demonstrate how much you have learnt, so maybe 50-50 is OK.» (Good)
- Should be more focus on active participation during the seminars than the quality of the written hand-in, some people did not say a single word during the seminar sessions.» (Excellent)


Lectures

5. What is your overall impression of Lecture 1 with Christine Räisinän?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»1 8%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»5 41%
Excellent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- i don"t really see why this lecture is needed from the later part of the course. maybe how to write a paper can come after all the seminars are done and before the term paper.» (Rather bad)
- Did not attend...» (Rather good)
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather good)
- It was quite good, but I think that maybe delivering an exercise before the lecture in order to have feedback about our gaps to improve our papers would have been a better way to actually learn by doing...» (Excellent)
- Very pertinent. I wish I had taken more advantage of it.» (Excellent)

6. What is your overall impression of Lecture 2 with Maria Elmquist?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»11 84%
Excellent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 4.15

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Very good)
- there were some repeat for our knowledge i think. but overall it was very useful for the course» (Very good)
- The same as the last comment.» (Excellent)


Seminars

7. What do you think about seminar-based teaching?*

13 svarande

Not useful at all»0 0%
Not so useful»0 0%
Quite useful»1 7%
Very useful»5 38%
Extremely useful»7 53%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

- It heavily depends on the seminar leader. If there is a good leader it is really useful, otherwise it is just a reason to read articles about a certain topic.» (Quite useful)
- Unlike others courses, students get the opportunity to raise questions, interact, discuss with other students and seminar leaders. It"s good that students are compulsory in contributing to the discussions. » (Very useful)
- It is very good, but I would say that there still exist some opportuinities to improve the both teaching and learning from the students.» (Very useful)
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Very useful)
- I think that the fact that we were so few participants really improved the knowledge process sharing» (Extremely useful)

8. What is your overall impression of Seminar 1 with Christian Sandström

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 50%
Excellent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Very good)
- The enthusiasm he puts on his job really improves the learning process and the interest on the topic.» (Excellent)

9. What is your overall impression of Seminar 2 with Thomas Hordern?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»1 33%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»1 33%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather bad)
- The only problem is that I was the only one who attended the seminar so, I could not say anything about the seminar. But the articles were pertinent, interesting and the learning was positive.» (Excellent)

10. What is your overall impression of Seminar 3 with Marcus Linder?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»2 33%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather bad)
- Very interesting with the small cases that he presented!» (Very good)

11. What is your overall impression of Seminar 4 with Sofia Börjesson?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»5 45%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»3 27%
Excellent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Felt more like a lecture than a seminar. » (Rather bad)
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather bad)
- i think Sofia is too much an expert compare to the phD students, thus half of the seminar was lecture in nature» (Rather bad)
- I really enjoyed the articles. There is too much to learn from the topic yet. The seminar was very interesting as well.» (Excellent)

12. What is your overall impression of Seminar 5 with Henrik Berglund?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»2 16%
Rather good»6 50%
Very good»4 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather bad)
- not, the best one in this course. I got the impression that he wasn"t prepared.» (Rather good)
- I do not why but I think it could have been better. I donot feel I learnt much on that seminar. The articles where rather OK, but still something that lacked.» (Very good)

13. What is your overall impression of Seminar 6 with Maria Elmquist?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»5 45%
Excellent»6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.54

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Very good)
- I was fascinated with the topic of open innovation. I even chose the topic to develop my term paper. Both the articles and the seminar were pertinent and the learning process was great.» (Excellent)

14. What is your overall impression of Seminar 7 with Jan Wickenberg?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»1 12%
Rather good»2 25%
Very good»1 12%
Excellent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Rather bad)

15. What is your overall impression of Seminar 8 with Joakim Björkdahl?

Only answer if you participated in the seminar!

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather bad»2 18%
Rather good»2 18%
Very good»6 54%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- The seminar leader introduced Business Model Canvas to students which is good. » (Very good)
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/» (Very good)
- Like the open innovation seminar, I learnt many things from the seminar. I have the impression that the seminar and the articles complemented each other in a perfect way. The basics were learnt on the articles and on the seminar the more advanced thoughts were developed.» (Excellent)


Additional comments

16. Please write down any additional comments and suggestions for improvements!

- Different seminar leaders might have different marking criteria and standards. »
- Some of the seminar leaders seemed a little unprepared and perhaps bored of being there. Sometimes, it was extremely hard to get your own opinion through because of dominant students. I think it would have been a more constructive discussion if the seminar leaders would have tried to balance the interaction among the students better. This issue was a result of that the active participation was graded. »
- One of the best courses i have read here at Chalmers. »
- I think that this course is one of the best I"ve taken during the master program. Its content is very interesting and I also found it good that we were allowed to choose which seminars we wanted to participate in. The discussions were overall good during the seminars and I learnt a lot more from them, than just reading the papers by myself. This course have taught me how to read an article effectively. »
- Deliver grades earlier to know if we are not meeting the needed requirements in order to get feedback and improve our hand-ins.»
- 1. The course is very interesting and useful. I would recommend it. 2. The workload is rather high so it would be wise to start early with the term paper (even before the topic is trated on the seminars) and the seminars as well. 3. There is no clear information what happen in the situation of no-passing the course. Is there a chance to do the term paper again?, the whole course next year?, just the seminars? a writen exam? 4. It would be interesting to have more seminar topics to choose from, so it is not necessary to have two sreminars on the same week since there is not enough time to reflect and knowledge needs time to consolidate. 5. I realized that there were some topics that did not capture the attention from the students. IT would be interesting to have the most interesting topics asking student what topic they want to learn. Get more feedback. 6. Maybe having one or two instances where one supervisor can give feedback from the term paper would be very helpful I think thats all. If I have more comments I would just write to Maria. B.R. »
- v3y1hf <a href="http://stdgedgvuuhe.com/">stdgedgvuuhe</a>, [url=http://dddjqsxardex.com/]dddjqsxardex[/url], [link=http://yvmqapnicsro.com/]yvmqapnicsro[/link], http://biauzciidtdf.com/»

* obligatoriska frågor


Kursutvärderingssystem från