ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Microsystems technology, MKM110, MPMIC,HT2007

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-11 - 2008-01-25
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 75%
Kontaktperson: Lena Peterson»
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 22%
Around 20 hours/week»3 33%
Around 25 hours/week»2 22%
Around 30 hours/week»2 22%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 44%
100%»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.55

- I was sick of so many teachers for just a single course. Even some teachers repeated, what some other teacher had already taught.» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 11%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.11

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 11%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 88%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.88

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 33%
Yes, definitely»6 66%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 44%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»1 11%
Large extent»6 66%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»7 77%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

- Due to many teachers of single course, the webpage was updated as required.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»1 11%
Rather poor»2 22%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»3 33%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- For different topics I had to search different teachers to ask questions and take guidence.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 66%
Very well»3 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»3 33%
Adequate»5 55%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 22%
Adequate»6 66%
High»1 11%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»1 11%
Fair»2 22%
Adequate»4 44%
Good»2 22%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab visit»
- All lectures on various types of MEMS like RF-MEMS etc.»
- The notes which our main course teacher "Anke Velasco" gave us, they really helped us. Because it was easy fo us to ask question when we had handouts of the lecture which was going on at that moment. »
- the clean room project»
- The project. But the evaluation should be performed in a different way.»
- Labs, but with better structure»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Measurement lab for the MEMS sensor was rather badly designed and should be changed.»
- Some other industry should be found to be visited. Sumba Sensor has no learning for students. I did not learn any thing from projects,except how to write a report, because practical setup for projects was far poor.For projects like fluid sensor and pressure sensor, students must be allowed to go to clean room and work there.»
- the way of communication between teacher and students»
- there are a lot of teachers with different expertise»
- The course needs more clear goals.»
- Lab-pm»

16. Additional comments

- Informations for the project work ( fabrication & device evaluation ) should be updated and better communicated»
- Teachers"s behavior was pretty good.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från