ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Research Design and Methods, TEK 190

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-24 - 2010-05-25
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 6%
Kontaktperson: Daniel Ljungberg»

Background

1. I am originally coming from*

4 svarande

Industrial engineering at Chalmers»3 75%
another programme at Chalmers»0 0%
another Swedish university»0 0%
I am an international student»1 25%
I am an exchange student»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

2. I approximately attended

4 svarande

20 % of the lectures»2 50%
40 % of the lectures»0 0%
60 % of the lectures»0 0%
80 % of the lectures»2 50%
100 % of the lectures»0 0%
I did not attend any lectures»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

3. How did you study for the exam?

For example, began with slides, looked for additional explanations in Bryman & Bell, and read summaries of the papers, while discussing with others.

- 1. slides 2. articles 3. book summary »
- Going through the book, reading bits and parts. Reading summaries of the papers. Then thoroughly going through the slides and discussing old exams with fellow students»
- Read Bryman & Bell, Slides and read summaries of papers»

4. How did you work in the project groups?

- it worked fine. good cooperation and good time management»
- Effective is a good word for it. Started planning on project 3 on reading week 2, divided that work and set some dates to be finished with certain parts. Project 2 we worked on simultaneously. »
- Reading book, discussing and following a plan»
- From distance»

Questions on the course

5. How important was the topic of the course?*

4 svarande

Irrelevant»0 0%
Not important»0 0%
Maybe useful»1 25%
Useful»2 50%
Very important»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. How much did you learn from the course?*

4 svarande

Nothing at all»0 0%
A little»0 0%
Medium amount»1 25%
Much»3 75%
Very much»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

7. How demanding was the course?*

4 svarande

Not at all demanding»0 0%
Slightly demanding»1 25%
Quite demanding»1 25%
Demanding»2 50%
Very demanding»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

8. How interesting do you think the topic of the course was?*

4 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Slightly interesting»0 0%
Quite interesting»3 75%
Interesting»1 25%
Fascinating»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

9. Was the course better or worse than you expected?

- a little better. good teacher!»
- Less work to do than I expected, so that was better. »
- Better»

10. Comments on the lecturer

- good, inspired, funny. interesting»
- Flexible and often interesting»
- Like the lectures»

11. Comments on the lecture slides

- WAY TOO MANY WAY TOO LITTLE STRUTURE!! 100 slides per PP is not ok. you should be able to use 20 pages»
- Many many many slides. Hard to see the red thread when there is so many.»
- Very easy to follow and get ideas»

12. Comments on the guest lecturers

Martin Wallin, Daniel Ljungberg

- was not there»
- Martin lost me after a while but he was good all in all. Daniel didn"t say much but the main message was probably understood of us, GIGO I think.»
- good»

13. Comments on the course book and compulsory articles?

- didnt read the book, only a summary articles was ok»
- Some articles were extremly long and were hard to understand the real use of, e.g. Hofstede,. Some philosophical mumbo jumbo in some of the articles was really hard to understand e.g. Landry. Course book was american, i.e. long and long but overall a good course book.»
- Book is to social»

14. How was Project 1 (KJ-Shiba), in terms of learning and demand?

- learning: it was interesting demanding: low»
- Learning = Great! Demand = So so»
- High learning, medium demand»

15. How was Project 2 (Lazy lecturer), in terms of learning and demand?

- learning: medium demanding_ medium»
- Learning = very good, Demand = not so demanding»
- High learning, high demand»

16. How was Project 2, in terms of listening to the other groups presenting different methods?

- boring»
- It was good and it made it easier to present as well since the audience wanted to hear your presentation. »
- GOOD»

17. How was Project 3 (Green innovation research), in terms of learning and demand?

- interesting, fun to do a more "applied" project»
- A good project. Sums up the course basically and it was fun to go out and try out everything and interviewing a lot of different people.»
- HIIIIIGH learning.. MEGA demanding!»

18. Comments on the exam (difficult? demanding?)

- it is on thursday so N/A»
- Unfortunately I did this evaluation before the exam so I have no clue.»

19. How was the "study environment" of the course, in terms of teacher interaction, student portal etc?

- It was good»
- good»

20. How was the administration of the course?

- good»
- Fine»
- good»

21. A course on research methods needs to deal with

a) hands-on issues concerning how to conduct research studies (e.g. how to construct questions in surveys), b) structural issues regarding how to proceed in a research study (e.g. "the Snake), and c) general research principles (e.g. falsification). Looking back at the course, what would you have liked to see more of, and consequently what would you have liked to see less of, in terms of these three issues? Why?

- less things like pointers and tips on how to make a survey. perhaps an even more hands-on case for next year incorporating some management issues or strategic issues iwthin a firm. a HBS-case perhaps»
- a) More examples of good questions, bad questions followed by comments? was evident in the lectures but I would have wanted more examples of good questionnaires and good questions and the reason for why they are good. For example putting a good question beside a bad one so we could have compared. b) That was very clear I think. c) The concept of falsification could have been explained more thoroughly, I looked it up on wiki afterwards but when you come to the more philosophical concepts... my mind wanders very easily becomes they are hard to grasp. »
- Maybe projct 3 can be divided with different hand-inds through the course, so we are having feedback.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.56

Other comments

22. Additional comments or suggestions

- nope!»

Thank you for your time.

Regards,

Magnus Holmén

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.56
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.64

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från