ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Sustainable development in a Southern context. Reality Studio 2010, ARK161/181

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-05-24 - 2010-06-10
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Catarina Östlund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Arkitektur 300 hp


Goals and fullfilment of goals

1. Learning outcomes in relation to the role of profession

1) Understand the professional work in a broader perspective and find new tasks on an international labour market.
2) To broaden the understanding of the own perspective and its limitations, through meetings with other professional and cultural perspectives on sustainable development.
3) To further develop a critical thinking and reflections on the professional role, the professional ethics and the needs for life-long learning.

6 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»1 16%
Excellent»5 83%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.83

2. Learning outcomes in relation to "Sustainable development"

1) Describe and relate to the political vision of Sustainable Development.
2) Provide evidence on the usefulness of design for sustainable development in different contexts.
3) To compare and assess different sources and statements concerning design for sustainable development.
4) To combine knowledge from different disciplines and sectors in proposals for actions and measures in design for sustainable development.

6 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 16%
Sufficient»2 33%
Excellent»3 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

3. Learning outcomes in relation to understanding and development of tools methods and analyse

1) Be able to understand the complexity of everyday life in specific cultural and social environments.
2) Be able to use system analytic methods and tools for the inventory and analysis of the built environment in different local situations and contexts.
3) Be able to analyse a local situation from macro to micro levels.
4) Be able to critically search for information and assess the quality of different sources of information.
5) To contain a participatory and trans-disciplinary approach in the design process.

6 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 16%
Sufficient»2 33%
Excellent»3 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Learningoutcomes in relation to the design process especially the communicative and visual part of it.

1) Be able to design and assess concrete proposals and solutions for local sustainable development.
2) Be able to visualise and communicate different proposals for clients, stakeholders and experts in different stages of the design process.
3) Be able to motivate different proposals with reference to scientific, or experience-based, knowledge and value-based arguments.
4) To combine scientific and artistic approaches in the design process.

6 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»2 33%
Excellent»4 66%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.66

5. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge?

6 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

6 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»6 100%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2


Education and course administration

7. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 33%
Rather good»4 66%
Very good»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Very bad information about what to bring and how to prepare for the field study. Teachers who have been to Kenya before should know what to bring. The tips from previous students were good, but how about making a list of things to pack, that can be updated every year accordig to student recommendations? Sleeping arrangements should be made before the trip so no-one needs to stay alone if they don"t want to.» (Rather bad)

8. Did you find the reflection exercises, lead by Pål, relevant and interesting?

6 svarande

Very much»3 50%
Quite much»3 50%
Not very much»0 0%
Not at all»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- Specially the last class after the trip, that was excellent!, but not so much the two before the trip.» (Quite much)
- Although I found it hard to combine personal reflections with giving references to literature.» (Quite much)

9. Were the lectures and assignments in the period before the fieldstudy relevant? See schedule

6 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Some of it»3 60%
Yes»2 40%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The mapping lecture was useless» (Some of it)

10. Was the time for preparation before the fieldstudy enough?

6 svarande

No»0 0%
Yes»6 100%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

- The time was enough, the information was not.» (Yes)

11. What support have you got for your learning from course literature and other material?

6 svarande

Very little»2 40%
Rather little»1 20%
Rather big»2 40%
Very big»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

- Reading about Africa was helpful.» (No opinion)

12. How did the organised activities during the fieldstudy work in terms of content and organisation? Visits to Maseno, tours, lectures and meetings.

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»3 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I choose "rather good" because of the content, but the organisation was not excellent. A lot of waiting time, but that is Kenya, I suppose.» (Rather good)

13. How did the tutoring during the fieldstudy work, in terms af access and process?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»3 50%
Very Good»2 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Access was OK, but the sessions were not very helpful. The best tutoring sessions was with other people than our own teachers, for example with mr Mwango.» (Rather bad)

14. How did the tutoring after the fieldstudy work, in terms of time, access and process?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Rather good»3 50%
Very good»2 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- The same as during the field study. We got the most useful tips and information from tutors outside the reality studio. » (Rather bad)

15. How do you rate the final presentation in terms of relevance of the feed-back and the organisation?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»3 50%
Very good»3 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Since it was a really interesting course that many people in Chalmers know, I think we should have done a bigger presentation to a bigger public.» (Rather good)
- I would like to receive real proper feedback from the professors» (Rather good)
- The feed-back was very good and relevant, but it felt more like a mid-term presentation than the final one. I would like to have some comments on the final report.» (Rather good)


Work environment

16. How do you rate the possibilities to get assistance and ask questions?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 16%
Good»2 33%
Very good»3 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

17. How has the cooperation between you and students in your group been?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»5 83%
I have not tried to cooperate»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- I say "rather good" because "rather bad" seems too harsh. It was sometimes very good and sometimes very bad. » (Rather good)

18. How were the conditions during the fieldstudy, in terms of sense of security, sense of community and privacy etc.

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»2 33%
Very good»4 66%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.66


Concluding questions

19. What is your overall opinion of the course?

6 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»0 0%
Good»1 16%
Very good»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

20. What should be preserved for next year?

- Most of the things. I think that even when it seemed lacked of organization, it help to open the eyes and see the real Kenya with its flaws.»

21. What should be changed for next year?

- The cirtics and tutorials should be more constructive. Don"t be afraid to say to the student that something is wrong. We need stong feedbacks sometimes.»
- Probably the cooperation with Maseno students should be made stronger or closer.»
- I would have liked to have a bigger studio for everybody to work in when we were back in Sweden.»
- Please take more responsibility for the organisation, especially before the field study. Students who have never before been to a developing country such as Kenya will be nervous, stressed and confused and in need of support - even though they are adults. Also, teachers should not get paid for sitting quiet during tutoring. If your role is more administrative - keep to that. Encourage students to find their own tutors outside the course.»

22. Other comments

- The field study was he greatest experience in my life so far, and I"ve gotten so many new friends. I would definitly recommend it to other students.»


Kursutvärderingssystem från