ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

NC-CAM 2010

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-03-04 - 2010-03-11
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 27%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Göran Rosén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 40%
Around 20 hours/week»2 40%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»1 20%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 20%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 20%
Yes, definitely»3 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 60%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- The book wasnt used very much.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

9. CAM ProE exercises.... Write two positive points and two points about things to develop for next year.

- the exercises are too good and i really understood how thing happen in CAD/CAM.Nothing to add in this,so samething to be followed for the next year.»
- provide software to work athome»
- positive: good exercises develop: prof-student relation, goal of the exercises not totally cleared»
- Very good Very well managed»
- They gave general knowledge about the CAM work, and also some skills in working with the software. To next year maybe its better to have a more updated instructions manual for the proe exercises. It would be appriciated to get feedback from the sent-in exercises.»

10. CADCAM communication task -Polishing robot: Write two positive points and two points about things to develop for next year.

- I clearly understood the rapid coding, i.e,from this exercise only i came to know that how robo works in the real life. some more exercises to be given and even something to be teached in rapid coding for the next year»
- different task for every one»
- positive: nice content, develop: rather vague exercise handout, support students in this exercises»
- Very good Very much cooperative»
- It gave practical knowledge of how to use the neutral file formats, but also what can be accomplished with the skill that you gained from the coarse. Next year a bit more advanced polishing movement.»

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»3 60%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 20%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»4 80%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

13. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

14. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
High»2 40%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- 3 courses» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Same CAD/CAM and Robo Polishing to be followed.»
- the polishing exercise, but better explained»

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- lecture slides need to be described clearly. So it will be useful for the students to learn from the slides itself.»
- the course contents organization»

18. Additional comments

- BG is a great great person! best wishes!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från