ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course evaluation Design of silent products, VTA155

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-01-15 - 2010-02-15
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Krister Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 80%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- Less than 15 hours/ week since it was over two periods.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the lectures offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 40%
100%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.6

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus (see http://www.student.chalmers.se/sp/course?course_id=11358) states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. To what extent do you feel like you have obtained the knowledge stated in the learning outcomes?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Deeper theory and introduction to available noise/vibration damping products are missed» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Is the working method appropriate to achieve the goals?

The working method was based on learning by doing and requires individual initiatives and engagement from the students.

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»3 60%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent have the lectures been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Deeper theory and introduction to available noise/vibration damping products are missed» (Some extent)

8. How was the presentation speed in the lectures?

5 svarande

much too slow»0 0%
a bit too slow»3 60%
adequate»2 40%
a bit too fast»0 0%
too fast»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

10. How do you judge the level of difficulty of the assignments?

5 svarande

much too difficult»0 0%
a bit too difficult»0 0%
adequate»5 100%
a bit too easy»0 0%
much too easy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

11. Was the time period assigned for the assignments sufficient?

The time period was...

4 svarande

much too short.»0 0%
a bit too short.»0 0%
adequate.»4 100%
a bit too long.»0 0%
much too long.»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

12. Where the assignments corrected like announced in the hand-out "Comments on assignments"?

5 svarande

not at all»0 0%
more or less»1 20%
fairly well»3 60%
completely»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

Experimental work

Theses question only concern courses with laboratory work

13. How well was the experimental work supported by the lectures?

5 svarande

The lectures were essential for the experimental work»1 20%
There is a need form more lectures»1 20%
One could have managed the experimental work wihout lectures»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

14. To what extend do you feel that the lectures helped your understanding of the physical concepts investigated in the experimental work?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 100%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Maybe some lectures about different noise generation mechanisms in different widespreadly used equipments would be useful» (Some extent)

15. How helpful was the supervision of experimental work?

5 svarande

very helpful»3 60%
moderatly helpful»2 40%
not helpful at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

16. How helpful was the supervision of analysing data?

5 svarande

Very helpful»3 60%
Moderatly helpful»2 40%
Not helpful at all»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

17. How did you percieve the correction of the report?

5 svarande

adequate»5 100%
not relevant»0 0%
too demanding»0 0%
not demanding enough»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the professor?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 20%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- On at the department once a week» (Rather poor)
- The professors were quite helpful in both experimental work and the analysis.» (Very good)

19. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help of the course assistent?

5 svarande

Very poor»1 20%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

20. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»1 20%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»1 20%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

21. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 40%
Adequate»3 60%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

22. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»2 40%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Summarizing questions

23. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 40%
Good»2 40%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It gave me a very good view of how one should approach a noisy product and how to solve its noise problem.» (Excellent)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The method of administration and supervising the course. It is more based on student"s work and that is what make you study and learn more.»
- labworks and experimental nature of the course»
- The redesign part»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More informative lectures are required.»
- Deeper theory and introduction to available noise/vibration damping products are missed»
- More examples from real life»

26. Additional comments

- Jag tycker ni borde fundera igenom ifall inte DSP-kursen skall utökas till 15p. Det finns dels stora möjligheter att fylla ut kursen till 15p, dels har det varit relativt problematiskt att matcha ihop ett kursupplägg under HT om man väljer att läsa DSP. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från