ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Biological Physics, FKA116

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-19 - 2010-01-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 34%
Kontaktperson: peter apell»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

1. To which program do you belong*

11 svarande

Ph.D»2 18%
Applied Physics Masters Student»4 36%
Nanoscale Science and Technology Masters Student»3 27%
Biomedical Engineering Masters Student»2 18%
Microtechnology Masters Student»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- Physics of Materials and Biological Systems, Masters Program» (Nanoscale Science and Technology Masters Student)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How well did the course reflect the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 10%
Not at all»0 0%
Adequatly»5 50%
Very good»4 40%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.2

3. How well did the course administration, pingpong, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»1 9%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»3 27%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

- Pingpong fungerade dåligt och tillför absolut ingenting mer än vad en enkel hemsida hade gjort. Oftast hamnade mailen från pingpong i skräpposten så information därifrån missades.» (Very badly)
- Ping pong feels rather immature.» (Rather badly)

The theoretical part of the course

This part of the course contains the lectures, the home assignments and the oral exam.

4. How useful were the lectures

11 svarande

Not useful»1 9%
Neutral»2 18%
Useful»3 27%
Very useful»5 45%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.09

- Väldigt användbart med de små tänka-själv-stunderna på föreläsningarna.» (Very useful)
- Peter sounds perfect» (Very useful)

5. How many lectures did you attend?

The total number of lectures was nine. Seven as part of the theoretical part and two informational.

11 svarande

0-1»0 0%
2-3»0 0%
4-5»2 18%
6-7»5 45%
8-9»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.18

6. How useful did you find the group tutoring?

11 svarande

Not useful»2 25%
Neutral»3 37%
Useful»3 37%
Very useful»0 0%
No opinion»3

Genomsnitt: 2.12

7. How many of the group tutoring occations did you attend?

11 svarande

0»3 27%
1»2 18%
2»6 54%
3»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»1 9%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»4 36%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.9 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Though a few more books in the library would be really helpful. If not then a permanent place where the course book is continually available throughout the year or atleast during the quater.» (Large extent)
- The book is well written. However some part of it could very well have benn much shorter.» (Large extent)

9. Were the home problems relevant?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Adequatly»6 54%
Very relevant»5 45%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.45

10. Did the home problems improve your learning?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 45%
To a large extent»6 54%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.54

11. Did the oral exam live up to your expectations?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 10%
To some extent»7 70%
Yes, definitely»2 20%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.1 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Felt a bit rushed.» (To some extent)
- Kändes tråkigt att man bara fick svara på en fråga när jag kunde så mycket mer än det. » (To some extent)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.52

The laboratory part of the course

This part of the course contains the laboratory work, the report writing and the presentation of the MAXI-lab.

12. How well prepared were you for lab 1 and 2?

11 svarande

Not at all prepared»1 10%
Rather well prepared»4 40%
Well prepared»5 50%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.4

13. How relevant to the course did you find lab 1 and 2?

11 svarande

Not relevant at all»1 9%
Rather relevant»6 54%
Very relevant»4 36%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- They were simplified examples which turned out to be helpful during the Maxi projects.» (Rather relevant)

14. Were the instructions for lab 1 and 2 clear and informative?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Adequatly»7 70%
Very clear and informative»3 30%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.3

15. Did the MAXI-project feel relevant to the course?

In the comments please state which MAXI-lab you performed (1-5).

11 svarande

Not relevant at all»0 0%
Rather relevant»3 30%
Very relevant»7 70%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- 5» (Rather relevant)
- MAXI-project #4» (Very relevant)
- 4» (Very relevant)

16. Did you find the instructions and reading material for the MAXI-project clear?

11 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Adequatly»2 20%
Clear»7 70%
Very clear»1 10%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- After briefing from the instructor the lab wa more clear.» (Clear)

17. How was the contact with your MAXI-project instructor?

Was he/she available for you and helpful in your learning and in carrying out your MAXI-project.
1=Very poor
5=Extremely good

11 svarande

1»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»0 0%
4»6 60%
5»4 40%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 4.4

18. Did you find yourself prepared for the report writing in this course?

10 svarande

Not at all»1 10%
Not sufficiently prepared»2 20%
Reasonably prepared»4 40%
Well prepared»3 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The level of specificity provided by myself in the report differed from that which was required. Maybe its not possible to cover everything, but maybe some other way can be thought of getting around this. Putting the deadline for the final draft after the exam week would be help instead of like it was this time. » (Not sufficiently prepared)
- Klart man vet rätt bra hur en rapport ska skrivas, men det var första gången som det togs på så stort allvar. Det var också svårt att veta vad som krävdes av en rapport som endast fick bestå av 500 ord, lite klarhet i det vore bra. » (Reasonably prepared)

19. How did you find the presentation and the opposition of the MAXI-project?

11 svarande

Very irrelevant»0 0%
Relevant but not necessary»3 30%
Relevant and useful»7 70%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- They were not well prepared and weren"t much help. Most of the questions, some of which might have been interesting were asked by the audience in general. » (Relevant but not necessary)

The future of the course

Here you may add additional comments regarding which parts of the course should stay the same for next year and which should be improved.

20. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 11%
Very good»7 77%
I did not seek help»1 11%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4

21. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 10%
Rather well»2 20%
Very well»7 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- excellent. We had a nice sitting together. They all were really helpfull and easy to talk with.» (Very well)

22. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»8 72%
High»3 27%
Too high»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.27

- Very fluctuating from week to week. Extremely little to do in the beginnning of the course.» (Adequate)

23. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 27%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»5 45%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

24. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 45%
Excellent»5 45%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.18

- This is one of the amazing & and interesting courses I have ever had» (Excellent)

25. What should be preserved to next year?

- Almost everything except maybe a bit of insight on the report writing part. And obviously the date for the final draft should be kept outside of the exam week.»
- Interaction with professors»
- The MAXI-project was great fun!»
- laboratory part»
- Lab1,2 and Maxi project»
- home problems»
- I feel that the format with a theoretical and an experimental part of the course has suited the course content well and should be preserved.»

26. What should be changed to next year?

- --as per above--»
- Written exam»
- Nothing in particular, I thougt the course was great.»
- lecture could be more vivid, not only showing and discussing pictures from the book»
- As elementary lecture on theoretical part»
- Do not schedule the talk with Sofia just 20 minutes before the oral exam, it got a bit difficult to make it on time to Peter. »

27. Please provide any additional comments

If you have opinions on it, comment on this course evaluation.

- Everything worked out great. Student should maybe be provided with a final lecture much like the opening one to make them realize opportunities for future research work.»
- The practical portions of the course has totally been rather biological and to my view it was not physics oriented in any ways.»

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.52
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.59

* obligatoriska frågor

Kursutvärderingssystem från