ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Risk Management & safety, IPE061

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-12-03 - 2007-12-20
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Mohammad Shahriari»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 42%
Around 20 hours/week»1 14%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 14%
50%»0 0%
75%»5 71%
100%»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- 85% if to be more precise.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

7 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 85%
No, the goals are set too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 28%
Yes, definitely»1 14%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

Teaching and course administration

6. How do you evaluate the quality of the guest lecture "Technical design of equipment... (ML)"

7 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Very good»2 40%
Good»3 60%
Not bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.6

7. How do you evaluate the quality of the guest lecture "Constructing safety (MT+)"

7 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Very good»2 33%
Good»4 66%
Not bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.66

8. How do you evaluate the quality of the guest lecture "Supply Chain Risk Management (UP)"

7 svarande

Excellent»2 33%
Very good»1 16%
Good»1 16%
Not bad»2 33%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2.5

9. How do you evaluate the quality of the guest lecture "Risk Management in Complex systems (RÖ)"

7 svarande

Excellent»1 33%
Very good»0 0%
Good»2 66%
Not bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»4

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- it wasn"t performed» (No opinion)

10. How do you evaluate the quality of the guest lecture "Complexity in logistic systems (P.O.A)"

6 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Very good»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Not bad»1 25%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3

- We didn"t have this lecture yet.» (?)

11. How do you evaluate the quality of the Workshop tutors

7 svarande

Excellent»0 0%
Very good»2 28%
Good»0 0%
Not bad»3 42%
Bad»1 14%
Very bad»1 14%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.85

12. How do you evaluate the quality of the Lab ex. tutors

7 svarande

Excellent»1 20%
Very good»1 20%
Good»1 20%
Not bad»2 40%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 2.8

13. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»2 28%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

14. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»1 14%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

Study climate

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»7 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»4 66%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

18. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

19. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»2 28%
Too high»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 28%
Good»4 57%
Excellent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- The course is very practical, it"s good. However, the course could be given separately to two groups: chemical engineers and others. Chemical engineers have more to do with detailed risk management not general one.» (Good)

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Clearer instructions for main project and home work. Separate page could be written in the course material describing what task are obligatory and how many of them will be during the course.»
- everything»
- Some extent in workshop tutor...maybe more organized and prepared. »

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Main project introduction should start asap in the beginning of the course and not left to the end of the course. It concerns also home assignment (40% of grade). Workshops could have higher value than 5% from the total grade.»
- nothing»
- Workshop tutor »

23. Additional comments

- .»
- -»

Kursutvärderingssystem från