ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Powertrain Mechanics 2009, TME170

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-12-15 - 2010-01-07
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 14%
Kontaktperson: Malin Kjellberg»


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»3 75%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 75%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.25


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 25%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 75%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 100%
Yes, definitely»0 0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Some question not brought up on lectures/in litterature clear enough. Too much vehicle dynamics in the differentils part.» (To some extent)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

7. What did you think about the lecturers?*

Please comment on the different lecturers and the subjects.

Matrisfråga

Sven Andersson - Engine balansing theory*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Very good»1 25%
Excellent»3 75%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Arjan Helmantel - Valves and valve trains*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»1 25%
OK»1 25%
Very good»2 50%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Anders Hedman - Conventional and dual clutch transmissions*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Very good»2 50%
Excellent»2 50%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Magnus Evertsson - Clutches and couplings*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»1 25%
OK»2 50%
Very good»1 25%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 3

Jan Andersson - Automatic planetary transmissions*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Bengt Jacobsson - Differentials, AWD, and AWD clutches*
4 svarande

Not well»1 25%
Bad»1 25%
OK»1 25%
Very good»1 25%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion/did not attend»0

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Jonas Hellgren - Hybrid vehicles*
4 svarande

Not well»0 0%
Bad»1 33%
OK»2 66%
Very good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion/did not attend»1

Genomsnitt: 2.66

8. What did you think about the different assignments*

Matrisfråga

Assignment 1 - Valve spring dimensioning*
4 svarande

Not relevant at all»0 0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»1 25%
OK»0 0%
Good»2 50%
Excellent and relevant»1 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Assignment 2 - Step transmission, ratios and gears*
4 svarande

Not relevant at all»0 0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»0 0%
OK»0 0%
Good»1 25%
Excellent and relevant»3 75%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4.75

Assignment 3 - Planetary gears*
4 svarande

Not relevant at all»0 0%
Bad - to some extent relevant for the overall topic»0 0%
OK»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Excellent and relevant»1 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 4

9. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 33%
Rather well»2 66%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66


Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 25%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

13. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

14. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25


Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments»
- Assignment 2+3, »

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Exam should be shorter.»
- The exam. Especially the differential part. Learning objectives could be clearer. Litterature could be better.»
- better preparation for the exam, better summary of the course»
- Jan Andersson"s lectures was hard to understand. The powerpoints could be better and the presentation a bit more pedagogical.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

18. Additional comments

- Having an exam question that questions part of a matlab code excersise handed out with just a few days to go to the exam just is mean and not really questioning the right parts! Also, having an exam question which is mainly a vehicle dynamic advance question doesn"t seem to be a part of the goal for the course.»

* obligatoriska frågor


Kursutvärderingssystem från