|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Road Vehicle Aerodynamics Advanced, TME175Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2009-10-22 - 2009-11-06 Antal svar: 10 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 83% Kontaktperson: David Söderblom» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - Varying a lot!» (Around 15 hours/week) 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.5 - Good lectures from Sinija, should have been some lecture of the softwares we used» (100%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Not that necessary, thou!» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.88 - dont know» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) Teaching and course administration5. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.9 - we had no literature more than Bernard» (Small extent) 6. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts, contact with supervisors etc work?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Web page and such thinks worked ok! But according to me the supervisors should have helped the groups equally. It was not obvious from the beginning that you could get that much help from them. But when helped was needed they were very helpfull. » (Rather well) Study climate7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - » (Rather poor) 8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Inside the group it went nicely, but other groups were not respecting booking of computers in the extent they should. » (Rather poorly) 9. How was the course workload?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3 - Generally I would have prefered some more lectures in vehicle aerodynamics.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions10. What is your general impression of the course?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - It would have been good if the case setup process could be speed up a bit so that there was some more time (and maybe even a lecture could be held) for analyzing the result» (Fair) 11. What is your impression of the lectures?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 - Too much theory and no clear explanation about things that we didn"t have enough background about. » (Adequate) 12. How would you rate the project work?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 13. What did you think about the project layout?How would you rate the project layout with pre-processing, solving and analysis?10 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.8 - Should have better guidelines/instructions for the pre-processing and solving so more time can be spent on the analysis.» (Adequate) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The project itself!»- The layout of the course.» - Project, Sinijas lectures, pro» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More guidens from the supervisors, so get an increased knowledge of what different parameters is doing in the program. »- More CFD examples for the real world» - More information about the softwares and tell all small tips that we missed. It will save a lot of time for students! It would also be good if each group could have one computer, it would help a lot. » - » 16. Additional comments- I felt like some groups and persons were favorits at the supervisors and that they got a lot more help, pesonally I would prefer if every group gets the same explanations even if they not search for it. Or at least telling the students that from the beginning.»- A good and interesting course in general, David and Christoffer should be more invloved and try to be more close to the students, help and support as much they can. Would be good to have some excercis-opportunities. Otherwise an really interesting course!» - Though the title says it is Advanced RVAD, there was nothing advanced about it. This course was all about pressing buttons!!! Even a 10th grade student could do it. U do not need to be in masters level to pass this course. »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%