ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Form design development, advanced course, PPU100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-05-25 - 2009-06-04
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 28%
Around 25 hours/week»5 71%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- rather normal workload. Often courses take much more time than justified by the points rewarded, but this course is well balanced.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 14%
100%»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 4.85

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- the course is very dopey » (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- don"t know what the goal is » (?)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»3 42%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»1 14%
Some extent»2 28%
Large extent»1 14%
Great extent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- The teacher has done a good job but the subject is so strange » (Some extent)
- The discussions during tutoring have been most helpful and rewarding.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»3 50%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- non, haven"t had any » (?)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 14%
Rather well»5 71%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 3

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»7 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»5 71%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 85%
High»1 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
High»6 85%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»1 14%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»2 28%
Excellent»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- don"t see why this course is given, especially not on a technical university » (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- nothing »
- The form focused development. It was a good experience to explore form without technical constraints.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Clearer structure of the goals during the first phase of the course. I know we where the first ones to do this course, but I don"t think revealing the goals later added something to the final results and the learning experience.»
- everything »
- clear rules for the format of presentation boards need to be given at an earlier stage.»
- There should be more support to help us take full advantage of the form exploring possibilities of Alias. What we have learned earlier has focused on form definition and there are far better tools to use when exploring shapes.»

16. Additional comments

- don"t think the course work at all. the process of using the 3D printer did not work at all, and I don"t see why Håkan that should help students with the printing is so unpleasant and reluctant to help - and why he gets crossed if on uses other software than Alias offered by the school isn"t it up to the student to chose which software to work with!!!! »
- It is not acceptable to give overly specified rules of how our presentation material should look half a working day before deadline. If there was a communication error somewhere, take that with you til next year and learn from it instead of trying to force last minute changes. It seems to have worked out nicely anyway.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från