ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Platform Development and Modularization Management, TEK020

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2010-12-08 - 2010-12-07
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Magnus Persson (Teknikens ekon»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 66%
Around 20 hours/week»3 25%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 1.58

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 16%
75%»4 33%
100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 58%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 10%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 90%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 50%
Yes, definitely»3 30%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 41%
Large extent»7 58%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- The Seminars were good!» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»7 58%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.08

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

12 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»8 66%
Very well»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- The points for the literatur seminar and hand ins could have been posted on the student portal as well» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 66%
Very good»3 25%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Good, fast answers by mail» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 8%
Rather well»6 50%
Very well»5 41%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

11. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»4 33%
Adequate»7 58%
High»1 8%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

12. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 8%
Adequate»6 50%
High»4 33%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.41

- Had a large product development course that took all time» (High)

Summarizing questions

13. What do you think about Magnus Persson"s lectures

12 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»8 66%
OK»4 33%
Poor»0 0%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- He only had 2 lectures and most of it was pretty obvious and more of a repetition» (OK)

14. What do you think about Göran Levin"s (Volvo Trucks) guest lecture

12 svarande

Very good»1 8%
Good»7 58%
OK»4 33%
Poor»0 0%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

15. What do you think about Kent Severinsson"s (Tetra Pak) guest lecture

12 svarande

Very good»2 16%
Good»9 75%
OK»1 8%
Poor»0 0%
Very poor»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

16. Compared with this year"s course, I would prefer to have:

Matrisfråga

Lectures
12 svarande

Much more»2 16%
More»5 41%
Same»5 41%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

Guest lectures
12 svarande

Much more»1 8%
More»6 50%
Same»5 41%
Less»0 0%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Literature seminars
12 svarande

Much more»0 0%
More»0 0%
Same»9 75%
Less»3 25%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Group work
12 svarande

Much more»1 8%
More»0 0%
Same»10 83%
Less»1 8%
Much less»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.91

17. I think that the weights given to the different parts in the course assessment should:

Matrisfråga

- Grading the literature seminars are good, because it makes you read everything well and in time. However, people who do not feel so comfortable about speeking have an disadvantage. Maybe smaller groups and more occasions for every seminar can be a solution to that.»

Topic reports (currently 60 out of 100 points)
12 svarande

Increase»1 8%
Stay the same»11 91%
Decrease»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

Literature seminars (currently 40 out of 100 points)
12 svarande

Increase»0 0%
Stay the same»11 91%
Decrease»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 2.08

18. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 16%
Adequate»5 41%
Good»5 41%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I think that it was mentioned, when the different elective courses was presented last year, that there should be company projects. Since that was left out, my grading of this course decreases.» (Fair)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Guest lectures»
- Guest lecturer»
- The seminars were good and there were som interesting discussions, the questions before demanded thorough reading of the materials. The topic reports were also interesting to work with. »
- The seminars are good»
- Literature seminars and some kind of group work with a topic»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- I would like to have the specific questions in the seminar, since sometimes I don"t really understand what others were asking.»
- More ordinar lectures»
- The presentation of the topic report was not good and you had already heard the content in the lectures...»
- Add some more basic knowledge at the beginning of the course»

21. Additional comments

- The literature seminars could be better. It should be more organized so that everyone that wants to talk could talk. The supervisor could have 1 or 2 topics ready that the participants know on beforehand if the discussion doesn"t run smoothly»

Kursutvärderingssystem från