ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Management of Physical Distribution, 2009, ITR585

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-04-24 - 2009-05-24
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 38%
Kontaktperson: Vahid Mirzabeiki»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Industriell ekonomi 300 hp


Participation

1. Approximately, how much time per week have you allocated to this course?*

Please estimate total amount of work including lectures, case studies and so on.

16 svarande

Maximum 15 hours/week»9 56%
About 20 hours/week»6 37%
About 25 hours/week»1 6%
About 30 hours/week»0 0%
More than 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

2. Estimate the amount of lectures that you have attended to.*

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 12%
50%»0 0%
75%»8 50%
100%»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

3. Estimate amount of time you have spent on the case studies.*

16 svarande

Less than 20 hours»0 0%
About 20 hours»7 43%
About 40 hours»8 50%
About 60 hours»1 6%
More than 60 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62


Fulfillment of the objectives

4. How understandable are the course objectives for you?*

16 svarande

It is hard to understand the course objectives»0 0%
The objectives could be more clear»5 31%
I know what I should learn in the course clearly»9 56%
I do not know»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 2.81 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Took looong time to understand the objectives..» (The objectives could be more clear)

5. Are the course objectives in line with the your background knowledge and the number of points of the course?*

16 svarande

No, the level of the course objectives is low»2 12%
Yes, the objectives are clear and in line with them»14 87%
No, the level of the course objectives are too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

6. Did the examination test if you have reached the course objectives?*

16 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extents»11 68%
Yes, in a high level»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.31 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I think I would be able to express my knowledge better in a home exam (hemtenta). It is hard to formulate quick answers in english. Usually I do not prefur home exams though.» (To some extents)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.33


Teaching and course administration

7. How much the lectures have helped your learning?*

16 svarande

Very little»1 6%
Rather Little»4 25%
To a raher large extent»8 50%
To a large extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- Only graphs is not a good way of teaching. Boring.» (Very little)

8. How much the course literature and the other course material have helped your learning?*

16 svarande

Very little»1 6%
Rather Little»3 18%
To a raher large extent»8 50%
To a large extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- The course material was incosistant in its usage of variable names. Feels like a draft translation. I realized too late that the same material is available in swedish.» (To a raher large extent)

9. How much did the case studies help your learning?*

16 svarande

Very little»3 18%
Rather Little»2 12%
To a raher large extent»6 37%
To a large extent»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

10. How much have the guest lectures helped your learning?*

16 svarande

Very little»1 6%
Rather Little»7 43%
To a raher large extent»5 31%
To a large extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- Very interesting and high quality guest lectures. I learned a lot, but i don"t know if it helped for the exam.» (To a large extent)

11. How much the calculation exercises have helped your learning?*

16 svarande

Very little»3 18%
Rather Little»2 12%
To a raher large extent»6 37%
To a large extent»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- They were good, but again the inconstiancy in variable naming (and definitions) was confusing.» (To a large extent)

12. How was the course administration, course homepage and the handed out material ?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 12%
Rather good»8 50%
Very good»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The ppt compendium could have been complemented with a few descriptive lines for each slide. Regarding the Time Edit system all students must be clearly informed that it is not being updated as one would expect. Or even better - have it updated. I understand this is a general problem and not for this course only.» (Rather good)


Study environment

13. How were opportunities to ask questions and to get help from the teachers of the course?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 12%
Rather good»9 56%
Very good»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- In a smaller class there is usually more discussions and everyone is more involved.» (Rather good)

14. How was collaboration between you and the other students in the course?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 31%
Very good»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 3.68


Lecturers and the examiner

15. How is your total assessment about the amount of effort Professor Kent Lumsden put on the course?*

16 svarande

Very bad»1 6%
Rather bad»2 12%
Rather good»8 50%
Very good»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

16. How is your total assessment about the amount of effort that Vahid Mirzabeiki put on the course?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»4 25%
Rather good»7 43%
Very good»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

17. How is your total assessment about the amount of effort that John Wedel put on the course?*

Guest lecture about the logistics service providers

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 12%
Rather good»9 56%
Very good»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- Don"t know» (Rather good)

18. How much is your total assenssment about the amount of effort that Per-Olof Arnäs put on the course?*

Guest lecture about the truck fleet operations.

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»2 12%
Rather good»10 62%
Very good»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Don"t know» (Rather good)

19. How much is your total assenssment about the amount of effort that Kjell-Åke Hvittfeldt put on the course?*

Guest lecture about the procurement of distribution.

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 6%
Rather good»11 68%
Very good»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

20. How much is your total assenssment about the amount of effort that Hans Hygrell put on the course?*

Guest lecture about the distribution of spare parts.

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 6%
Rather good»7 43%
Very good»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

21. How much is your total assenssment about the amount of effort that Niclas Andersson put on the course?*

Guest lecture about the Air distribution.

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 18%
Rather good»7 43%
Very good»6 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.18


Concluding questions

22. What is your total estimation of the course?*

16 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»5 31%
Rather good»6 37%
Very good»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 3

23. Do you recommend the course to the students of the next year? If NO, please motivete your answer*

16 svarande

Yes»13 81%
No»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 1.18

- Because, in the end you really improved your knowledge.» (Yes)
- The leactues didn´,t felt structured, it was hard to find the conections between them sometimes. And it felt that it was all about diffrent pictues and tabels and it was hard to understand them.» (No)
- the course was too basic.» (No)

24. Any comments?*

16 svarande

Yes»2 12%
No»14 87%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- Make it better to next year! It didn´,t felt like a mastercourse, not so challenging at all. The assignments felt as one of htose we did in highschool.» (Yes)
- Can you list the exam results onto the wall outside the office as other lecturers usually do?» (Yes)


Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.56

* obligatoriska frågor


Kursutvärderingssystem från