ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Computational Biology 2, FFR115

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-16 - 2009-08-16
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Anders Eriksson»

1. To which program do you belong

4 svarande

Masters GU»1 25%
Masters Chalmers»2 50%
International Masters GU»0 0%
International Masters Chalmers»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

2. How were the lectures

4 svarande

Not useful»0 0%
Below average»1 25%
Average»2 50%
Above average»0 0%
Very Useful»1 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I think it was evident that Anders wasn"t very experienced as a lecturer. However, the only way to learn is to keep doing it. I think the lectures would be improved by having less information on each slide. Now I felt that every detail always had to be in there, which just made it hard to understand which part was the key to understanding. Keep handing out both sets of lecture notes, but write on the blackboard during lectures and focus on the important facts.» (Below average)

3. How were the problem sessions:

4 svarande

Not useful»0 0%
Below average»0 0%
Average»0 0%
Useful»1 50%
Very useful»1 50%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- I don"t think I went to any. Were they scheduled?» (No opinion)

Your own effort

4. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»2 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 25%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

- High workload just before each deadline, not to much in between.» (Around 20 hours/week)

5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 25%
50%»1 25%
75%»1 25%
100%»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- I found the lectures a bit boring (see previous comment)» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

6. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 50%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

- I do not remember all the goals» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

7. Are the goals reasonable

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

2 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»1 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 2

8. Did the examination reflect the goals of the course?

2 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»1 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I have not finished my tasks» (Yes, definitely)

9. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»1 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- As always, Bernard"s lecture notes were very useful.» (Large extent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 50%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Homeproblems did not appear on the homepage in time(the last one that is).» (Rather badly)
- The link to the final example sheet wasn"t even activated. This has to work better!» (Rather badly)

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 50%
Very good»1 25%
I did not seek help»1 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.75

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 75%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»1 25%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

13. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- One more example sheet could definitely be included.» (Adequate)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 25%
Adequate»1 25%
High»2 50%
Too high»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- More CAS courses should be available this period!» (Low)

15. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- I think the simulations and the other things that are presented are very interesting. Nothing needs to be changed when it comes to what"s included in the course.» (Good)

16. What should be preserved to next year?

- examples sheets»
- The last three example sheets were very good! Definitely among the best in all of the CAS courses.»

17. What should be changed to next year?

- Lecture dynamics»
- The lectures as I"ve written above. Also, the first example sheet should be changed. It was quite boring if one had taken the course in neural networks, and probably very tricky if one hadn"t.»

18. Please provide any additional comments

If you have opinions on it, comment on this course evaluation.

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.25

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.25
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från