Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Molecular Electronics, MCC075, MPMIC, VT2009, MCC075

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-03-08 - 2009-03-21
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 23%
Kontaktperson: Sheila Galt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 60%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

5 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 20%
100%»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 20%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 40%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»2 40%
No, the goals are set too high»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- The single molecule electronics needs too much quantum mechanic background that I did not have before. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»1 25%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»2 50%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- some part of Tomas quantum calculation was difficult for me. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»2 40%
Some extent»2 40%
Large extent»1 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- I think all the lectures should have some reading material resource, but for single electronic no book was offered. » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

5 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 40%
Rather well»2 40%
Very well»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I prefer student.chalmers.se » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 40%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»0 0%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 60%
Very well»2 40%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 60%
High»1 20%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- There shouldn"t be NO exam at the end.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 20%
Adequate»3 60%
High»0 0%
Too high»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»2 40%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
Good»1 20%
Excellent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- There are so little notes on the slide, so that I can not understand the logical connection and the concept presented in each slide. So there must be much more notes in the slides. There were no hand out for this course. If the lecturer could give the sides as hand out it will help so much more. »
- Thorvalds lectures were very good, computer lab was very nice.»
- The course materials and the course instructors should be preserved as they did try to help me understand the subject very clearly. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The book seems not very good for this course. so it might be much more better if teacher could present us a series of sources for each and every lecture. They can be hand outs, or notes in slides, or web address or any other kind of stuff!»
- EXAM system»
- Tomas quantum calculations, because the nano students have the same in the other course. and I could not find those heavy quantum stuff in the Molecular electronics book by Michael C Petty. »
- none»

16. Additional comments

- Only LAB or Project will be enough for this course. OR change the exam system, Multiple Choice Question would be good option. FKA196 course exam system can be followed.»
- For me the part1 of the course was much more attractive and It seems that it have more application. so, it would be better to focus on this part. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från