ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ubiquitous Computing 2008, TDA471

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2009-01-19 - 2009-01-25
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Olof Torgersson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»3 50%
Around 30 hours/week»1 16%
At least 35 hours/week»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Didn"t count the time, but I would say it sometimes felt a lot.» (Around 25 hours/week)
- other than the first week I spent at least 4 full days a week, something like 40 hours per week.» (At least 35 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»1 16%
100%»5 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.83

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 16%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- My background might incline the answer toward "no the goals are set too high"» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- It would be better to focus on some aspects like project and presentations or the theoretical parts.» (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 33%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Om man bortser från hemtentan.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»3 50%
Some extent»1 16%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- Not too much technical learnings, and not so much design practice, due to both lack of time, and of course that we have to come up with a solution from the beginning in order to carry on with the project: little to no time to explore the actual design situation.» (Small extent)
- Design processes needs instructors with more time at lab, so they can help in the area of electronics or software.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»2 33%
Some extent»2 33%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Kvantitet över kavlitet.» (Small extent)
- The teacher can have more oppinions and guidence about the papers. It won"t hurt students.» (Some extent)
- Reading the literature made me discover the UC field, and its implications. As well, it gave me some opportunity to have new ideas of problems i would like to solve» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Snygg webbplats. Visst är det bra med uppdateringar över email men Lalya spammade ju oss ,)» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 50%
Very good»3 50%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Båda Lalya och speciellt Ole hade fantastiskt bra attityd när det gällde att hjälpa till.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 16%
Rather well»3 50%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Många utlänningar klarade uppenbarligen inte av arbetsbördan eller hade förväntad arbetsdisciplin. Vissa grupper hade det tufft p.g.a tvångsindelningen.» (Rather well)

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
High»2 33%
Too high»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- Including a home exam was not a good idea. The course"s workload was already much.» (Too high)
- Hemtentamen var på gränsen till onödig. 35 texter är inte realistiskt att läsa. 12 (2 per LS) hade räckt. Vissa övningar som att göra posters kändes direkt förolämpande att göra. Bortkastad tid som kunde lämnats åt hemtentan.» (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»1 16%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
High»3 50%
Too high»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- Interaction Design Methodology var tuff men i den kursen kändes allt arbete befogat.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»1 16%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»2 33%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- En bra kurs som förstörs av dåligt upplägg.» (Adequate)
- The outcome as a prototype is very good.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Prototype.»
- Ole. Bästa handledaren någonsin. Lalya. Hon är hjälpsam och bryr sig och bör vara kvar. Bara hon styr upp alla problem.»
- The projects»
- Realizing a working prototype is a must. Fixed groups is fair enough, but better care should be granted to have different specialties and common interests in groups. »
- to mix group members in different gender, nationality. It is BRILLIANT.»
- Project work»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The home exam is not necessary to be included.»
- Mindre texter till hemtentan (en tredjedel är mer än väl). Betalningssättet. Om en student köper något för egna pengar skall han/hon få ersättningen direkt och inte efter jullovet. Några 100-lappar är mycket pengar för en student. Schemaläggningen. De 3 veckorna före projektstarten kan kortas ner en vecka som kan läggas åt hemtentan så den sträcker sig över jullovet. Hemtentan. Ännu en fråga kortare och tid avsatt för endast den innan jullovet.»
- There should be given oposibilities to get help from professionals when creating prototypes that the students cant handle themselves, (working with wood, metal and plastic) »
- Literature is very important, but perhaps the questions should be handed in more clearly prior to the lecture seminars. More time to perform a meaningful study of the design situation, and award credits to discern if a new design brings too many negative consequences in a given situation. Of course, this is difficult to implement in the case of this course, so i should maybe constitute the subject of some other course. As well, opportunity, even so little, should be devoted to design process. I.e. the design methodology course should be the first one of the ID programme. Not simultaneous with this course.»
- Literature seminars»

16. Additional comments

- The course was very good, but the inclusion of home exam is not a good idea.»
- Jag är nöjd med kursen men aldrig har jag sett en sådan kollektiv irritation över en kurs. »
- Thanks for the course, and god fortsättning»

Kursutvärderingssystem från