ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Projects in Supply Chain Management, TEK 275

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-02-02 - 2009-02-31
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 42%
Kontaktperson: Kajsa Hulthén»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week have you worked with the course?

- 15»
- >25»
- 20»
- 20»
- 20»
- 10»
- 10»
- 15»

Group membership

2. What group did you belong to?

- VTEC»
- Skanska»
- Skanska»
- VTEC Security»
- VTECH»
- The 5S study»
- Volvo Revolution»
- Volvo revolution project»

Seminars and course administration

3. What do you think about the seminar by Logistema?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 37%
Good»4 50%
Very good»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Good exapmle of how they were working with projects and also how you could solve them. » (Good)

4. What do you think about the seminar by Ernst & Young?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»3 37%
Good»3 37%
Very good»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

5. What do you think about the planning seminar?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»2 25%
Good»3 37%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- Very good to have. Both in learning purpose and for the actual report. Good to get feedback and to get ideas for other groups.» (Very good)

6. What do you think about the final seminar?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 12%
OK»0 0%
Good»4 50%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- It could have been planned a bit earlier.» (Good)
- Interesting to see the other projects. » (Very good)

7. How well did the course administration work?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»2 25%
OK»1 12%
Good»1 12%
Very good»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- poor supervision and poor comitment on behalf of the copmany. my view is that the company wasn"t aware of the level of involvement needed» (Poor)
- Easy to get in contact when you needed. » (Very good)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.75

Work climate

8. How was the interaction with the supervisor?

8 svarande

Very poor»1 12%
Poor»1 12%
OK»2 25%
Good»0 0%
Very good»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- Super!» (Very good)
- No problems at all, got all help we needed. » (Very good)

9. How was the interaction within the group ?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
OK»1 12%
Good»2 25%
Very good»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- We were only two persons in the group and maybe that helped. No problems in the group.» (Very good)

Concluding questions

10. What is your general opinion of the course?

8 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
OK»3 37%
Good»3 37%
Very good»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- The project could have been more related to SCM than security.» (OK)
- I know that the courses like project in six sigma and quatliy and operations project from the other program work much better than this. check what are they doing right and what can be taken for this course» (OK)
- Overall, its a good introduction to the master thesis. I think that the students should be aware of that it is their responsability to get the needed information as is done in a master thesis. However, I believe that the course could be imporved by adding a lecture in the beggining including methodology that is more connected to research, also to have a deadline for final changes in the end. This would make the course more structured. » (Good)
- I would recommend it to all SCM students.» (Very good)

11. What should be kept to next year?

- almost everything»
- The great general idea about the project course. The supervision and guidance during the projects (specifically in Skanska project). The possibility for students to get into the industries and learn as much as they want!»
- Guest seminars»
- All seminars.»
- Planning seminar and final seminar must be there. The other two lectures are fun to have there but they are, to me, not as important but they should be kept.»
- cooperation with industry»

12. What should be changed to next year?

- More concrete structe of how to conduct project with solid description. More supportive seminar»
- Maybe ensuring about the quality of supervision in some projects (one of the Volvo projects)»
- Earlier presentations of the final report so that there will be time for a last revision including the opponents comments.»
- The final seminar could been planned earlier.»
- Add mandatory meetings with the groups just to avoid missunderstandings like the one that happened this time with one of the Volvo groups. It is up to the students to contact the supervisior but it could be good to have one or two appointments just to see progress and/or problems if there are any. Also add a final deadline for changes. Lecture about method in research sould be good to have.»
- be clear on expectations. Ask to the company for real commitment and real projects»

13. Other comments

- I appreciate your efforts in giving us such a great opportunity. I, personally, learned a lot!!»
- Overall a good course, the outcome of the course is much up to the student and that is good in the end of the master program.»
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.75
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.68

Kursutvärderingssystem från