ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Modern Imaging, Spectroscopy and Diffraction Techniques, TIF030

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-12-09 - 2008-12-09
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 91%
Kontaktperson: Jari Kinaret»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Teknisk fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

Estimate the total time, that is, the time you spent in class or outside class working on this course. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 h/week» 3 27%

About 20 h/week» 5 45%

About 25 h/week» 3 27%

At least 30h/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Spend most time to read handed out texts.» (At most 15 h/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 3 27%

100%» 8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

Goals and their fulfillment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 4 36%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 2 18%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this and the following question only if you know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 1 9%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 9 81%

No, the goals are set too high» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Fore people without physics background, the goals were set to high.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination(s) assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all» 0 0%

To some extent» 4 36%

Yes, definitely» 7 63%

Do not know/Have not yet attended examination» 0

Genomsnitt: 2.63

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Minor extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 2 20%

Large extent» 6 60%

Great extent» 2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Minor extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 6 54%

Large extent» 4 36%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- Some of the SEM/TEM part were two abstract. » (Minor extent)
- No exam date. Lab PM avalible to late.» (Some extent)
- All information earlier, perhaps at course start? No webpage for GU students. » (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc. work?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 3 27%

Rather poorly» 1 9%

Rather well» 6 54%

Very well» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- Took too long until operational.» (Very poorly)
- Additional comments and information to the PPT on the optical part would have been nice. Additional background information wanted, were it can be found.» (Very poorly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 6 54%

Very good» 5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

Workload

10. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Reasonable» 5 45%

High» 3 27%

Too high» 3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

11. Were the laborations relevant for the course?

11 svarande

Not at all» 0 0%

Partly» 0 0%

Satisfactorily» 2 18%

Very Relevant» 9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Overall impression and specific recommendations

12. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 1 9%

Good» 8 72%

Excellent» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The wide range of techniques in the course.»
- Labortaions Miniworkshop»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- More examples during class. Administration! Miniworkshop tool too long·»
- Administration Feedback on assignments during the course. Too long until the exam were corrected. SPM: Too much material in comparison with the time. - One extra session instead of one miniworkshop?»

15. Additional comments

- Learned a lot!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från