ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ecology for Engineers, KKM022

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-11-13 - 2008-11-20
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Morgan Fröling»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 25%
Around 20 hours/week»1 25%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»2 50%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 25%
75%»3 75%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»4 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

4. What priority did you give this course?

What priority did you give this course compared to other courses you studied during quarter 1.

4 svarande

Much higher»0 0%
Higher»1 25%
Equal to other courses»3 75%
Lower»0 0%
Much lower»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»3 75%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

6. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 50%
Large extent»2 50%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Study climate

7. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»2 50%
I did not seek help»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- Morgan was always willing to answer questions during and after lectures, which is appriciated» (Very good)

8. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»4 100%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

9. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 75%
High»1 25%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I like that the workload was spread out during the entire course, which differed it from other courses I had.» (Adequate)

10. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Had three cources at the same time» (High)

More detailed questions on the course

11. Will this course be useful for you in your life as a professional?

4 svarande

Yes»4 100%
NO»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

12. What is your opinion on the course structure with many small projects?

4 svarande

Very good»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Rather bad»1 25%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

13. Was the work load for the projects reflected in the points given?

4 svarande

Yes»4 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

- No larger deviations in workload» (Yes)

14. Were the projects relevant for the course?

4 svarande

Yes»4 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

15. Was the Eco-test a good way to check preknoledge?

4 svarande

Yes»4 100%
No»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

16. Were the field trips relevant for the course?

4 svarande

Yes»3 75%
No»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- Good that we got a pragmatic view on how it worlds» (Yes)

What is your opinion on the lectureres?

17. Morgan

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

4 svarande

Very good»3 75%
Good»1 25%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.25

- Creates interests and is genuinely interested in explaining and teaching.» (Very good)

18. Gunilla

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

4 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»3 75%
Not so good»1 25%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.25

19. Magdalena

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

4 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»4 100%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

20. Guest lecturere - Stefan

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

4 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»4 100%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

21. Guest lecturere - Madelene

Please give you comments also in text, especially regarding ability to create interest for his/her topic and structure of lectures.

4 svarande

Very good»0 0%
Good»4 100%
Not so good»0 0%
Bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Summarizing questions

22. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 50%
Good»2 50%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

23. Do you think that the examination form with the bonus system in this course is good?

4 svarande

No, this should be changed»0 0%
It can be improved»0 0%
The system is OK»3 75%
The system is excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The levelled workload»
- The projects and Morgan.»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The ecotest is only pass or fail and the same for the projects. No bonus points when doing the exam.»

26. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.25
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.25
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från