ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Kursutvärdering av Logic in Computer Science, DAT060

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-18 - 2007-12-18
Antal svar: 21
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 30%
Kontaktperson: Thierry Coquand»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

21 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»13 61%
Around 20 hours/week»8 38%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.38

- Didn"t have more time because of work. Wish I had more though.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- have taken a similar course before» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

21 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 4%
75%»5 23%
100%»14 66%

Genomsnitt: 4.47

- The lectures were really good. I really liked the end with LTL and CTL (SAT-algorithm).» (100%)
- I would say around 90%, but that"s closer to 100% than 75%=)» (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

21 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 19%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»10 47%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.95

- I always try my best and then after a course I assume I fulfill the goals of the course.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

21 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»20 95%
No, the goals are set too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- Maybe too slow in the beginning of the course but I can understand that since there are many people with different background in the course.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»1 4%
To some extent»6 28%
Yes, definitely»6 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»8 38%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The test exam was fun to do though.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»1 4%
Some extent»10 47%
Large extent»8 38%
Great extent»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

- Jan"s lectures were hard to follow. His English is hard to understand.» (Some extent)
- More exercises are needed» (Some extent)
- Exercise sessions did not give me that much but the lectures were really good.» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»4 19%
Some extent»6 28%
Large extent»8 38%
Great extent»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- I have read the book much.» (Small extent)
- The course book wasn"t available at Cremona until three weeks into the study period which from my view is unacceptable.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

21 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»4 19%
Rather well»14 66%
Very well»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Missing slides from the lectures.» (Rather well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

21 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»1 4%
Rather good»4 19%
Very good»13 61%
I did not seek help»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

21 svarande

Very poorly»1 4%
Rather poorly»2 9%
Rather well»3 14%
Very well»14 66%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.57

11. How was the course workload?

21 svarande

Too low»2 9%
Low»5 23%
Adequate»12 57%
High»2 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

12. How was the total workload this study period?

21 svarande

Too low»2 9%
Low»3 14%
Adequate»10 47%
High»5 23%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I read three different courses » (Too high)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

21 svarande

Poor»1 4%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»7 33%
Good»10 47%
Excellent»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- Started slow but then really came into some interesting things. I like a lot of theory and proofs so this was perfect for me in the end.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Harald is clearly gifted and is easy to communicate but could seem somewhat more prepared for presenting the problems. I"m sure he manages to solve problems live, but the presentation could be more clear. Also liked the commented solution page. It"s always nice to have some indication towards whether you"re doing things right.»
- LTL, CTL, more on monotone functions and SAT-algorithm.»
- Well, teaching environment and great teacher, almost hard problems can be interpreted in understandable way. Academic attitude to study, friendly students. »
- Lectures and exercisies»
- CTL and LTL»
- exercises lectures.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe a little less on propositional logic.»
- Att ha några labbar eller uppgifter som man ska klara av under kursen underlättar för eleven att hålla koll på vad han kan och motiverar honom att läsa mer. Hade hjälpt mig mycket.»
- You should have small assignment to make program more interesting.»
- Having lab assignments, definitely the best way of learning things.»
- More excerises»
- turn in some homework or assignments»
- More practical examples of why logic is important for a computer scientist! The exercise sessions should have had more problems on the same "level" as the exam. The lectures could be held at a higher tempo. An extended lecture diary would have been helpful.»

16. Additional comments

- Harald needs to be on much more prepared for exercises. He is often late and uses alot of time thinking of the answer him self.»
- Great lecturer.»


Kursutvärderingssystem från