|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Product Development Management Evaluation, IAR061Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-11-14 Antal svar: 29 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 58% Kontaktperson: Andreas Dagman» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.62 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.68 - Good lectures! Did not attend all literature reviews.» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.86 - The goals were presented several times as good as possible and are understandable. But I think these goals in general are overestimated. You understand the goals but the link between them and what really counts on the exam is often poor. What I mean is that you don´,t get any help from the goals, what they say is obvious. And what counts in the end is how well you have read the book, the handouts and so on. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer) 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - No prequisites needed» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.79 - The goals talks about dilemmas,organizational issues, strategies, methods, tools and so on... And yes, thats what the exam is about. But the goals could just as well say: read the book and participate on the lectures..» (To some extent) Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.34 - Very good lectures, interesting!» (Great extent) 7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.17 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.65 Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.86 10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 11. How was the course workload?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.17 - It was hard to know exactly what was expected from the topic reports.» (Adequate) 12. How was the total workload this study period?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.2 - My own fault since i"m taking 3 courses» (Too high) Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?29 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - One of the best courses so far at chalmers! » (Excellent) 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Some kind of groupdynamic event so that the groupwork goes more smothly.»- The Lean Development game.» - The development game! At first I didn"t find it to be that instructive but afterwards I really thought about the issues, regarding communication, customer requirements etc., that became evident in the role-play.» - Literature reviews and external lecturers» - The lectures» - Mr Trygg» - Lars Trygg and the course book» - the guest lecturers» - The topic reports should definetly be preserved.» - The variation of moments in this course was very good for the learning process. The case was good and the topic report gave som deeper knowledge in som areas. The game was quite fun and the litterature reviews was good. Also the guest lecture was good.» 15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- The qustion about the reports on the exam.»- This is a good and interesting course, nothing needs to be changed.» - A better planning of the lectures. Not in the aspect of content but rather in their order for them to fit the guest-lecurers presentations and the knowledge the students have accumulated at that point. In that case I think it would be easier to understand and ask relevant questions.» - Give information about presentation earlier and inform that the presentation influence the grade on the project. » - nothing» - The case lecture shoul be carried out in smaller classes» - One more case study like "applied materials" can be added» - Mayby to have the guest lecture later in the course to be able to understand a bit more.» - Nothing!» 16. Additional comments- Great lecturer»- Lars is a good teacher!» - Inspiring and interesting lectures!» - Really bad that last years exam where nearly exactly the same as this year when some people in the class have access to the old exam.» - Good course.»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13%