ENKÄTER

 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.


Industrial design engineering - theory and methodology (lp1)

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-10-20 - 2008-10-31
Antal svar: 18
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Oskar Rexfelt»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers


Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

18 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»6 33%
Around 25 hours/week»7 38%
Around 30 hours/week»4 22%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3

- I spent a lot of time in reading books and papers,and get some knowlege about design theory and methodology which i have not learned before.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

18 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 11%
75%»1 5%
100%»15 83%

Genomsnitt: 4.72

- The most things I have learned, were during the preparation of the papers. The lectures were very interesting, but for my meaning a little bit to "high". (not all, but one-two)» (50%)
- closer to 100% then 75%...» (100%)


Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

18 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 11%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 22%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»12 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.44

- because the level of my english, I cannot catch some information about this course.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- I did read them in the beginning of the course, but now I doesn"t really remember how they were formulated..» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- I think the goal of this course is theory and methodology of industrial design,and I think it is really a broad field. » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 76%
No, the goals are set too high»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- I think the goal reasonable considering my background.i can get knowlege that is useful in my understanding of design.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- I have an engineering background, more theory would be welcome before starting reading and writing papers.» (No, the goals are set too high)
- Since we have another course too, the workload should be smaller. » (No, the goals are set too high)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

18 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»7 38%
Yes, definitely»3 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»8 44%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- each assignment can assess our understanding about the course and goal.» (Yes, definitely)


Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»10 55%
Large extent»6 33%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- i am sorry that i have not catch some parts of content in course clearly because my poor listening,but i can learn from the PDF from our teacher.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

18 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»2 11%
Large extent»13 72%
Great extent»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.88

- was no course literature » (Small extent)
- course literature and other material can help us to get deep understanding in learning.» (Large extent)
- But I would have preferred to get some guidelines for the poster assignment.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

18 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 5%
Rather well»10 55%
Very well»7 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- i can find some information about this couse in web page and handouts. » (Rather well)
- All assignment handouts were not available on the course web page.» (Rather well)


Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

18 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 27%
Very good»11 61%
I did not seek help»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

- MariAnn was always reachable by mail.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

18 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 33%
Very well»11 61%
I did not seek cooperation»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

- It was more difficult to work with some of the chinese students, mostly due to the fact that they were not as good in speaking english.» (Rather well)
- in this course,i have opportunities to cooperate with other students,and learn a lot from them. » (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 11%
High»14 77%
Too high»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 4

- i sorry that i read books and papers not very quikely which make me to spent a lot of time on them.but i enjoy learning them,although course workload is high,i think it is interesting. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

18 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»3 16%
High»10 55%
Too high»5 27%

Genomsnitt: 4.11

- i have 3 course,alias eco-marathon and this course,from each course i can learn different things,i enjoy my busy and workload.» (Adequate)


Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

18 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»4 22%
Good»10 55%
Excellent»4 22%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It has been really interesting to explore different methods and strategies regarding product development work within different disciplines.» (Good)
- i like this course very much,and i think there are still a lot of field i have not learned about theory and methodology,i will continue learning and read books even the course is finish. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The approach of introducing and comparing methods, processes, different aspects of engineering, design, HF. The part with discussing cultural differences as it is relevant with the mix of students attending the course!»
- The assigments very varied and very interesting. Especially the interview was a good opportunity to learn more.»
- differernt ways of assignments,let student to choose topic which they are interesting.»
- The different types of exercises, it gave a variety in the course and you did not get bored.»
- The group exercises»
- a lot of assignments»
- Good assignments. »
- the interview assignment is quite interesting.»
- The written assignments. It is good to have an opportunity to practice the english writing in the beginning of the master.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some lectures were too long, two hours is maximum.»
- interaction in class between teacher and students and amoung students.»
- The feedback on what you have done should come a little earlier. The course is over, but I have no idea of what MariAnn thinks of may work.»
- Less written assignment, maybe a little examination on theory could be good.»
- Maybe a little less workload. It would have been good to get back the assignments during the course so that the rest of the assignments could be better. »
- maybe more lectures.»
- not to prepare soooo long papers :-)»
- The lectures are pretty heavy to follow. I don´,t know if it is possible to change but I sometimes felt it was hard pay full attention the whole lecture through. Probably due to the new language and the pretty complicated issues that were discussed. Interesting though!»

16. Additional comments

- Great class. Nice to meet you.»
- I found that it is generally easier to reach a better result, and also receiving a higher grade, when working with people with the same background as me (swedish). This is bad since the cooperation with people of other backgrounds is a really good experience. The two competing interests of easy cooperation and cross cultural experience should be taken into account in some way. I want to feel I can take a chance and work with someone with a different background without having to risk my entire grade. Perhaps this is done by MariAnne "behind the scenes" already, but I don"t know. Perhaps we could write a short individual report to each assignment where we describe how the cooperation has worked out.»


Kursutvärderingssystem från